Wydział Elektryczny - Automatyka i robotyka (S1)
Sylabus przedmiotu Control engineering:
Informacje podstawowe
Kierunek studiów | Automatyka i robotyka | ||
---|---|---|---|
Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | inżynier | ||
Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK, kompetencje inżynierskie PRK | ||
Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
Moduł | — | ||
Przedmiot | Control engineering | ||
Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Automatyki i Robotyki | ||
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Paweł Dworak <Pawel.Dworak@zut.edu.pl> | ||
Inni nauczyciele | |||
ECTS (planowane) | 4,0 | ECTS (formy) | 4,0 |
Forma zaliczenia | egzamin | Język | angielski |
Blok obieralny | 11 | Grupa obieralna | 1 |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
---|---|
W-1 | basics of control theory, modeling of dynamic systems, basics of signal theory; basics of industrial measurement |
Cele przedmiotu
KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
---|---|
C-1 | To familiarize students with the construction of continuous and digital versions of PID controllers |
C-2 | To familiarize students with various structures of control systems |
C-3 | To familiarize students with the clasification of digital control algorithms and the practical aspects of their synthesis |
C-4 | To familiarize students with the properties of the most important algorithms and digital control |
C-5 | To familiarize students with the idea and properties of adaptive and robust control systems |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
---|---|---|
laboratoria | ||
T-L-1 | Continous and digital PID | 4 |
T-L-2 | Properties of the cascade control system | 2 |
T-L-3 | Properties of the compensation control system | 2 |
T-L-4 | Properties of two-state (and three-state) control systems | 3 |
T-L-5 | Anti-windup in PID controllers | 2 |
T-L-6 | Properties of model following control scheme (MFC) | 2 |
15 | ||
projekty | ||
T-P-1 | Presentation of the scope of the project; Projects should cover the following range of issues: • Determining ARIMAX discrete models of a continuous control object with one input and one output and examining their properties in the Matlab/Simulink environment. • Implementation and simulation tests of the properties of the minimum-variation (MV) control algorithm in the Matlab/Simulink environment. • Implementation of the PID control algorithm with an anti-wind up system in a programmable controller. • Research on selected adaptation methods in control systems. • Self-tuning elements of PID controllers. | 2 |
T-P-2 | Practical project implementation and consultations | 11 |
T-P-3 | Presentation of the project and discussion of the obtained results | 2 |
15 | ||
wykłady | ||
T-W-1 | PID controllers, continuous and digital form of PID controller, Anti-windup in PID controllers, Self-tuning of PID controllers | 6 |
T-W-2 | Requirements for control systems. Sensitivity of control systems to changes in dynamic object parameters and disturbances. Sensitivity functions for continuous and discrete control systems. Cascade control system. Compensation control scheme. Two-state (and three-state) control system | 6 |
T-W-3 | Clasification of digital control algorithms. Methods of synthesizing digital control algorithms – theoretical and practical aspects. Generalized ARIMAX discrete model of continuous SISO control plant | 2 |
T-W-4 | Minimum Variance Control (MVC) | 2 |
T-W-5 | Adaptation in control systems - adaptation with auxiliary values, indirect, direct. Basics of robust control. | 4 |
20 |
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
---|---|---|
laboratoria | ||
A-L-1 | participation in classes | 15 |
A-L-2 | preparation of reports from laboratory exercises | 8 |
A-L-3 | consultations | 2 |
25 | ||
projekty | ||
A-P-1 | participation in classes | 15 |
A-P-2 | own work and preparation of a report on the project implementation | 8 |
A-P-3 | consultations | 2 |
25 | ||
wykłady | ||
A-W-1 | lecture attendance | 20 |
A-W-2 | exam | 2 |
A-W-3 | self-study | 22 |
A-W-4 | preparation for the exam | 6 |
50 |
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
---|---|
M-1 | Delivery methods: informative lecture, description, explanation |
M-2 | Activating methods: didactic discussion |
M-3 | Practical methods: demonstration, laboratory exercises, simulations, project method |
Sposoby oceny
KOD | Sposób oceny |
---|---|
S-1 | Ocena formująca: grade given during a series of laboratory classes based on reports |
S-2 | Ocena podsumowująca: The grade is awarded at the end of the series of laboratory exercises based on partial grades from the submitted reports and the activity and work of individual team members during the exercises. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR_1A_C21.2_W01 Student ma uporządkowaną wiedzę w zakresie analizy wymagań, budowy i działania klasycznych układów regulacji liniowymi obiektami dynamicznymi. | AR_1A_W03 | — | — | C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5 | M-1, M-2 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR_1A_C21.2_U01 Umie sformułować zadanie sterowania oraz zaprojektować układ sterowania dla typowych obiektów dynamicznych o określonych właściwościach. | AR_1A_U04, AR_1A_U08 | — | — | C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5 | T-L-1, T-L-2, T-L-3, T-L-4, T-L-5, T-L-6, T-P-1, T-P-2, T-P-3 | M-2, M-3 | S-1, S-2 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
---|---|---|
AR_1A_C21.2_W01 Student ma uporządkowaną wiedzę w zakresie analizy wymagań, budowy i działania klasycznych układów regulacji liniowymi obiektami dynamicznymi. | 2,0 | The student does not know the basic features and structure of the regulation systems being the subject of the lecture. Obtained less than 50% of the total number of points on the assessment forms for this effect. |
3,0 | The student knows the basic features and structures of control systems that are the subject of the lecture. He obtained 50-60% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
3,5 | The student knows the basic features and structures of control systems that are the subject of the lecture. He obtained 61-70% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
4,0 | The student knows the basic features and structures of control systems that are the subject of the lecture. He obtained 71-80% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
4,5 | The student knows the basic features and structures of control systems that are the subject of the lecture. He obtained 81-90% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
5,0 | The student knows the basic features and structures of control systems that are the subject of the lecture. He obtained 91-100% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
---|---|---|
AR_1A_C21.2_U01 Umie sformułować zadanie sterowania oraz zaprojektować układ sterowania dla typowych obiektów dynamicznych o określonych właściwościach. | 2,0 | The student does not implement the basic regulatory structures discussed during classes. Obtained less than 50% of the total number of points on the assessment forms for this effect. |
3,0 | The student correctly implements the basic regulatory structures discussed during classes. He obtained 50-60% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
3,5 | The student correctly implements the basic regulatory structures discussed during classes. He obtained 61-70% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
4,0 | The student correctly implements the basic regulatory structures discussed during classes. He obtained 71-80% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
4,5 | The student correctly implements the basic regulatory structures discussed during classes. He obtained 81-90% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. | |
5,0 | The student correctly implements the basic regulatory structures discussed during classes. He obtained 91-100% of the total points on the assessment forms for this effect. |
Literatura podstawowa
- G.Goodwin, S.Graebe,M.Salgado, CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN, 2000
Literatura dodatkowa
- W.Findeisen, Technika regulacji automatycznej, PWN, Warszawa, 1969
- J.Lisowski, Podstawy automatyki, Uniwersytet Morski w Gdyni, 2022
- S.Węgrzyn, Podstawy automatyki, PWN, Warszawa, 1972