Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Biotechnologii i Hodowli Zwierząt - Biotechnology (S2)

Sylabus przedmiotu Master Seminar:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Biotechnology
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom drugiego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta magister inżynier
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK, kompetencje inżynierskie PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Master Seminar
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Nauk o Zwierzętach Monogastrycznych
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Anita Kołodziej-Skalska <Anita.Kolodziej@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele
ECTS (planowane) 1,0 ECTS (formy) 1,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
seminariaS3 25 1,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1Completion of the library training
W-2The ability to edit the text
W-3The knowledge and ability to use statistical methods in biotechnology

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Preparing a master thesis. Preparing for a thesis defense.
C-2The students become acquainted with the softwares and information services that enable searching for materials used in thesis. The studends gain knowledge concerning techniques and ways of formulating questions and database searching. The students are informed how they can access the full text of journal articles. They are able to create a bibligraphy by themselves either using a bibligraphic management tools. The students become acquainted with the ethical aspects in scientific work and the basis of copyright.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
seminaria
T-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.1
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.1
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.1
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.6
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.6
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.5
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.5
25

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
seminaria
A-S-1Participation in classes25
25

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Independent work of a student coordinated by a thesis advisor during consultation hours.

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Continuous assessment of students' work progress during consultation.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Diploma exam and defense of the master thesis.

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_W01
The student has an advanced knowledge concerning the methods, techniques, tools and materials allowing for analysis and exploiting nature's potential.
BTap_2A_W06C-1T-S-1, T-S-2, T-S-3, T-S-6, T-S-4, T-S-5, T-S-7M-1S-1
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_W02
The student knows the methodology of preparing and writing master thesis. The student knows the softwares and information services that enable searching for materials used in thesis. The student is fully aware of the techniques and ways of formulating questions and database searching. He/She knows how he can access the full text of journal articles. He/She knows the rules concerning a creation a bibligraphy by himself/herself either using a bibligraphic management tools. He/She is aware of the ethical aspects in scientific work and the basis of copyright.
BTap_2A_W09C-1T-S-1, T-S-2, T-S-3, T-S-6, T-S-4, T-S-5, T-S-7M-1S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_U01
Student has an ability to conduct research experiments and/or to use a laboratory diagnostics methods depending on the character of master thesis.
BTap_2A_U05, BTap_2A_U09C-1T-S-1, T-S-2, T-S-3, T-S-6, T-S-4, T-S-5, T-S-7M-1S-1
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_U02
While working on the final preparation of master thesis, student uses his/hers deepen knowledge on statistical and bioinformatic analysis. The student knows how to select proper softwares and information services that enable searching for materials used in thesis. He/She knows how he can access the full text of journal articles. He/She knows the rules concerning a creation a bibligraphy by himself/herself either using a bibligraphic management tools.
BTap_2A_U02C-1T-S-1, T-S-2, T-S-3, T-S-6, T-S-4, T-S-5, T-S-7M-1S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_K01
The student shows comprehension and confidence of knowability of the processess and biological phenomenons that are the subject of his/hers master thesis.
BTap_2A_K02C-1T-S-1, T-S-2, T-S-3, T-S-6, T-S-4, T-S-5, T-S-7M-1S-1
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_K02
The student understands the meaning of ethical and social aspets related with research and professional work and intelectual honesty. He/She knows how to use the scientific databases. He/She develops the ability of scientific communication. He/She is aware of ethical aspects of scientific work - he/she knows the basis of copyright.
BTap_2A_K04, BTap_2A_K07C-1T-S-1, T-S-2, T-S-3, T-S-6, T-S-4, T-S-5, T-S-7M-1S-1

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_W01
The student has an advanced knowledge concerning the methods, techniques, tools and materials allowing for analysis and exploiting nature's potential.
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_W02
The student knows the methodology of preparing and writing master thesis. The student knows the softwares and information services that enable searching for materials used in thesis. The student is fully aware of the techniques and ways of formulating questions and database searching. He/She knows how he can access the full text of journal articles. He/She knows the rules concerning a creation a bibligraphy by himself/herself either using a bibligraphic management tools. He/She is aware of the ethical aspects in scientific work and the basis of copyright.
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_U01
Student has an ability to conduct research experiments and/or to use a laboratory diagnostics methods depending on the character of master thesis.
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_U02
While working on the final preparation of master thesis, student uses his/hers deepen knowledge on statistical and bioinformatic analysis. The student knows how to select proper softwares and information services that enable searching for materials used in thesis. He/She knows how he can access the full text of journal articles. He/She knows the rules concerning a creation a bibligraphy by himself/herself either using a bibligraphic management tools.
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_K01
The student shows comprehension and confidence of knowability of the processess and biological phenomenons that are the subject of his/hers master thesis.
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
BTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_K02
The student understands the meaning of ethical and social aspets related with research and professional work and intelectual honesty. He/She knows how to use the scientific databases. He/She develops the ability of scientific communication. He/She is aware of ethical aspects of scientific work - he/she knows the basis of copyright.
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Andrews G., How to write a master's dissertation: outline and examples, Amazon Digital Services LLC, 2017
  2. Sahlman P., How to write a masters thesis fast: Practical productivity tips for students, Amazon Digital Services LLC, 2012
  3. Andrews G., Writing your dissertation literature review: a step-by-step guide (Essay and Thesis Writing Book 8), Amazon Digital Services LLC, 2017

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Andrews G., Academic writing guide: paragraph structure (Essay and Thesis Writing Book 11), Amazon Digital Services LLC, 2017

Treści programowe - seminaria

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.1
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.1
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.1
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.6
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.6
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.5
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.5
25

Formy aktywności - seminaria

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-S-1Participation in classes25
25
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięBTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_W01The student has an advanced knowledge concerning the methods, techniques, tools and materials allowing for analysis and exploiting nature's potential.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówBTap_2A_W06has knowledge of advanced laboratory methods, techniques and engineering tools allowing to perform technical tasks tailored to the biotechnology
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing a master thesis. Preparing for a thesis defense.
Treści programoweT-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Independent work of a student coordinated by a thesis advisor during consultation hours.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Continuous assessment of students' work progress during consultation.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięBTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_W02The student knows the methodology of preparing and writing master thesis. The student knows the softwares and information services that enable searching for materials used in thesis. The student is fully aware of the techniques and ways of formulating questions and database searching. He/She knows how he can access the full text of journal articles. He/She knows the rules concerning a creation a bibligraphy by himself/herself either using a bibligraphic management tools. He/She is aware of the ethical aspects in scientific work and the basis of copyright.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówBTap_2A_W09knows the research techniques and the principles of preparing and writing a scientific paper
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing a master thesis. Preparing for a thesis defense.
Treści programoweT-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Independent work of a student coordinated by a thesis advisor during consultation hours.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Continuous assessment of students' work progress during consultation.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięBTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_U01Student has an ability to conduct research experiments and/or to use a laboratory diagnostics methods depending on the character of master thesis.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówBTap_2A_U05can individually and in a group design and implement experimental process, including measurements, applicable in biotechnology; interprets the results obtained and draws conclusions; conducts discussions based on self-knowledge acquired using specialist language
BTap_2A_U09uses the learned methods in research work; develops the literature in accordance with the research profile; analyzes scientific reports and other source materials in the context of own research project; is able to prepare a project of his/her own scientific research and prepare a scientific study himself/herself
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing a master thesis. Preparing for a thesis defense.
Treści programoweT-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Independent work of a student coordinated by a thesis advisor during consultation hours.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Continuous assessment of students' work progress during consultation.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięBTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_U02While working on the final preparation of master thesis, student uses his/hers deepen knowledge on statistical and bioinformatic analysis. The student knows how to select proper softwares and information services that enable searching for materials used in thesis. He/She knows how he can access the full text of journal articles. He/She knows the rules concerning a creation a bibligraphy by himself/herself either using a bibligraphic management tools.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówBTap_2A_U02knows how to plan and analyze biotechnology research using bioinformatics tools
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing a master thesis. Preparing for a thesis defense.
Treści programoweT-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Independent work of a student coordinated by a thesis advisor during consultation hours.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Continuous assessment of students' work progress during consultation.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięBTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_K01The student shows comprehension and confidence of knowability of the processess and biological phenomenons that are the subject of his/hers master thesis.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówBTap_2A_K02demonstrates understanding of biotechnological processes used in various areas of human activity; interprets and describes these processes using a scientific approach
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing a master thesis. Preparing for a thesis defense.
Treści programoweT-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Independent work of a student coordinated by a thesis advisor during consultation hours.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Continuous assessment of students' work progress during consultation.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięBTap_2A_AP-S2-B07_K02The student understands the meaning of ethical and social aspets related with research and professional work and intelectual honesty. He/She knows how to use the scientific databases. He/She develops the ability of scientific communication. He/She is aware of ethical aspects of scientific work - he/she knows the basis of copyright.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówBTap_2A_K04is aware of the ethical and social standards related to the carried out research and professional activities; understands the desirability of proceeding in accordance with the established ethical and legal principles
BTap_2A_K07understands the desirability of stimulating individual cognitive activity and raising professional competences; demonstrates independence in acquiring scientific information from various sources
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing a master thesis. Preparing for a thesis defense.
Treści programoweT-S-1To make all students familiar with the criteria as well as editorial requirements for writing master thesis in the fileld of biotechnology. Disscusion of the Master's graduation procedure in the Faculty.
T-S-2What is plagiarism - legal consequences of plagiarism.
T-S-3Guidelines for students beginning a research study and organisation of a workshop.
T-S-6Guidelines for the preparation of the firt version of master's thesis. Organizing the writing process. Analysis of the reference text. Guidelines concerning writing a discussion section and formulating conclusions.
T-S-4The pronciples of selecting research methods. Technical rules on compilating the results - creation of tables, graphs and drawings.
T-S-5The principles of selecting and analysing a sientific literature. Links to the literature, bibliography. Linguistic problems and methods to overcome it, foreign language terms.
T-S-7Guidelines for preparing a research presentation.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Independent work of a student coordinated by a thesis advisor during consultation hours.
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Continuous assessment of students' work progress during consultation.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
3,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
4,5Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.
5,0Evaluation criteria are individually established by a thesis supervisor.