Wydział Architektury - Architecture (S2)
Sylabus przedmiotu Architectural design 2:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Architecture | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | drugiego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | magister | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK, dziedzina sztuki PRK, kompetencje inżynierskie PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Architectural design 2 | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Projektowania Architektonicznego | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Robert Barełkowski <Robert.Barelkowski@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | Jarosław Bondar <Jaroslaw.Bondar@zut.edu.pl>, Tomasz Sachanowicz <Tomasz.Sachanowicz@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| ECTS (planowane) | 4,0 | ECTS (formy) | 4,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | angielski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | W-1: podstawowa znajomość warunków technicznych, podstawowa wiedza techniczna w zakresie budownictwa ogólnego, podstawowa wiedza o materiałach |
| W-2 | W-2: podstawowa wiedza o teorii architektury, znajomość podstaw psychologicznych architektury, wiedza o pierwiastkach antropologicznych w architekturze |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne. |
| C-2 | C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| T-P-1 | Introduction to organization of the subject, introduction to design themes, establishing aims and individual programs. | 3 |
| T-P-2 | Complexity and area of integration in architectural design – the definition of design problem. Analysis of spatial context (or cultural context), social context, and broad environmental approach. | 3 |
| T-P-3 | The definition of compulsory problem solving area for the project. The definition of the idea and functional program. | 3 |
| T-P-4 | The establishment of aims and criteria system for self-evaluation of the project. The establishment of spatio-functional program and spatial context with the inclusion of analysis of its multiple interpretations. | 3 |
| T-P-5 | The focus of design concept – embodiment of an idea and program within the architectural form. The final definition of project scope. | 3 |
| T-P-6 | Project progress screening (also: mid-semester screening) with self-evaluation of the project (current status). | 3 |
| T-P-7 | The aim and the structure, the functionality and the durability. The adjustment of the program, formal solution, and response to contexts. | 3 |
| T-P-8 | The establishing of action plan for subsequent ranges of the project – parallel design courses, solving dedicated problems of architectural/building technology (variable and adjusted to particular theme of the project), embodiment of architectural idea with the acknowledgment of cultural requirements, with use of technical and technological support. | 3 |
| T-P-9 | The elaboration of compulsory systemic non-architectural elements of the project – the structure, installations, etc. | 3 |
| T-P-10 | Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals. | 3 |
| T-P-11 | Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals (continued). The plan for presentation of final solution / proposal. | 3 |
| T-P-12 | Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals (continued). Establishing means for graphic and verbal communication of the project in a clear way. | 3 |
| T-P-13 | Consultations – c.d. opracowywania rozwiązań indywidualnych. Detale prezentacji projektu. | 3 |
| T-P-14 | Submission of ready-for-final-screening project and elaboration of the presentation. | 3 |
| T-P-15 | Final screening of the project – conceptual design, technical design, multimedia presentation. | 3 |
| 45 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Introduction to topics contained within the subject, architecture as a complex system, perspective of complexity in design. | 1 |
| T-W-2 | Managing complexity in architectural design – information flow, information validation (hierarchization) and assessing the impact of information on design decisions. Establishing aims of the design. | 1 |
| T-W-3 | Design – synergy in acquisition of information and professional knowledge generation. Design and learning. | 1 |
| T-W-4 | The area of perception and psychology issues in architecture. | 1 |
| T-W-5 | Socio-cultural sphere in architecture. | 1 |
| T-W-6 | The meaning of architecture – idea and quality of design solutions (functional, formal). | 1 |
| T-W-7 | Object technology – extra-architectural solutions determining the quality of architecture. | 1 |
| T-W-8 | Permanent user, temporary user, recipient – meaning, preparation of space and its reception by above mentioned groups. | 1 |
| T-W-9 | Typological analysis of objects as point of departure for distinction of differences comprehension and elimination of invalid solutions. | 1 |
| T-W-10 | Analytics in design process. Reasoning-focused shaping of decisive background within the field of architecture. | 1 |
| T-W-11 | Acknowledging spatial context, interpretation of the notion of context (abstract approach) and its transposition in architecture. | 1 |
| T-W-12 | Public discussion – complexity issues, interdisciplinary issues and architecture (students’ participation). | 1 |
| T-W-13 | Case studies – discussion of various dedicated types of architectural objects (elaborated in particular semester). | 1 |
| T-W-14 | Case studies – discussion of various dedicated types of architectural objects (elaborated in particular semester). | 1 |
| T-W-15 | Summary – synthesis of knowledge acquired during semester. | 1 |
| 15 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| A-P-1 | participation in classes | 45 |
| A-P-2 | own studies and work on project development | 28 |
| A-P-3 | consultation | 2 |
| 75 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | attending the lecture | 15 |
| A-W-2 | individual work at home – expanding knowledge of subject apprehended on lectures | 6 |
| A-W-3 | exam | 2 |
| A-W-4 | Consultation | 2 |
| 25 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester) |
| M-2 | M-2 Exercice-practical methods: observations in situ, design |
| M-3 | M-3 Exposing methods: presentation – screening (Project Progress Screening) |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes) |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: S-2: Summary evaluation: final screening, presentation of the project, substantial complex evaluation of final and submitted project according to criteria indicated in the program of the course |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_K-10_W01 W1: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of interdisciplinary integration within the field of architecture. | AUP_2A_W01 | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3 | M-1 | S-1 |
| AUP_2A_K-10_W02 W2: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of transposition of information/knowledge (interdisciplinary) onto architectural object or architectural space. | AUP_2A_W02 | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3 | M-1 | S-1 |
| AUP_2A_K-10_W03 W3: Comprehension of complex systems performance and appropriate interactions of architecture with those systems. | AUP_2A_W03 | — | — | C-1 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3 | M-1 | S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_K-10_U01 U1: Skill to integrate various disciplinary knowledge in the field of architecture and their transposition into architectural design. | AUP_2A_U01 | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-P-1, T-P-2 | M-1, M-2, M-3 | S-1, S-2 |
| AUP_2A_K-10_U02 U2: Reception of basic skills to manage information within design proces in case of complex task. | AUP_2A_U02 | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-P-1, T-P-2, T-P-3, T-P-4 | M-1, M-2, M-3 | S-1, S-2 |
| AUP_2A_K-10_U03 U3: Using basic knowledge of complex systems within design. | AUP_2A_U03 | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-P-1, T-P-2, T-P-3 | M-1, M-2, M-3 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_K-10_K01 KS1: Student has ability to synthesize and communicatively convey design idea in public. | AUP_2A_K06 | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-P-14, T-P-15, T-P-6 | M-1, M-2, M-3 | S-1, S-2 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_K-10_W01 W1: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of interdisciplinary integration within the field of architecture. | 2,0 | failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course) |
| 3,0 | basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 | |
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 | outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3 | |
| AUP_2A_K-10_W02 W2: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of transposition of information/knowledge (interdisciplinary) onto architectural object or architectural space. | 2,0 | failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course) |
| 3,0 | basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 | |
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 | outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3 | |
| AUP_2A_K-10_W03 W3: Comprehension of complex systems performance and appropriate interactions of architecture with those systems. | 2,0 | failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course) |
| 3,0 | basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 | |
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 | outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3 |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_K-10_U01 U1: Skill to integrate various disciplinary knowledge in the field of architecture and their transposition into architectural design. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 | ||
| AUP_2A_K-10_U02 U2: Reception of basic skills to manage information within design proces in case of complex task. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 | ||
| AUP_2A_K-10_U03 U3: Using basic knowledge of complex systems within design. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_K-10_K01 KS1: Student has ability to synthesize and communicatively convey design idea in public. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Literatura podstawowa
- Alexander, C., New Concepts in Complexity Theory. Arising from the Studies in the Field of Architecture, Cardiff, 2003, pp. 23
- Barełkowski, R., Design Driven by Discovery, in J. Baek, T. Daniell, J. M. Heredia, B. Jacquet and S. Russell, Architecture and Phenomenology, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, EFEO Research Center, Kyoto, 2009
- Barełkowski, R., Verbal Thinking in the Design Process. Internal and External Communication of Architectural Creation, Common Ground Publishing, Chicago, 2010, Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, Vol. 4, Issue 5, 127-138
- Barełkowski, R., Paradoks skali, Przestrzeń i Forma, Polska Akademia Nauk Oddział w Gdańsku, Szczecin, 2010
- Barełkowski, R., Learning design by knowing less, in J. Verbeke i B. Pak (eds.), Knowning (by) Design, Sint-Lucas School of Architecture, Hogeschool voor Wetenschap & Kunst, Brussels, Department of Architecture, KU Leuven, Brussels-Gent-Leuven, 2013, 517-524
Literatura dodatkowa
- Alexander, C., Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1964
- Alexander, C., A Timeless Way of Building, Oxford University Press, New York, 1979
- Alexander, C. Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S., A Pattern Language. Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press, New York, 1977