Administracja Centralna Uczelni - Wymiana międzynarodowa (S1)
Sylabus przedmiotu Ergonomy. Health and Safety.:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Wymiana międzynarodowa | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | |||
| Obszary studiów | — | ||
| Profil | |||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Ergonomy. Health and Safety. | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Instytut Architektury i Planowania Przestrzennego | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Marek Ostrowski <mostrowski@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | Marek Ostrowski <mostrowski@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| ECTS (planowane) | 5,0 | ECTS (formy) | 5,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | angielski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Basic knowledge of the architectural design, geometry and building materials |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | The acquisition of basic knowledge about human, his physical and sensory efficiency and about factors affecting the quality of life in the developed environment. |
| C-2 | The acquisition of the ability to apply the ergonomic knowledge and the ergonomic analysis criteria into the architectural and interior design and public spaces. |
| C-3 | Developing empathy for the needs of the disabled users of the space. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| T-P-1 | The project of the reception area for two employees with maximum 9 square meters floor area: equipped with the necessary equipment (computer, telephone, fax, printer), adjusted for three groups of phantom users, including people in a wheelchair. The analysis of the adjustment of the public space or the public utility buildings for the physically disabled people and the blind. | 45 |
| 45 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Ergonomics in the architectural design and in everyday life of the users of the space. Engineering knowledge about the human body. Anthropometry, biomechanics, physiology of the sensory organs. The determinants of the efficiency of sight. Work post at the computer and the optimization of the workplace. Spatial environment of the life of people with disabilities. The accessibility of the public spaces and facilities for the people with disabilities and the blind. The ergonomics of housing and sanitary premises. | 15 |
| 15 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| A-P-1 | Participation in the classes, project work | 45 |
| A-P-2 | Graphic design of projects | 30 |
| 75 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | Participation in lectures compulsory | 30 |
| A-W-2 | Literature studies, acquisition of knowledge from lectures | 20 |
| 50 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Lecture information using a multimedia presentation |
| M-2 | Group and individual correction of of projects |
| M-3 | Exercises involving the enclosed independent problem solving ergonomic and discussing their results |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena formująca: Periodical check-ups of the creative use of ergonomic knowledge by the students in a form of design tasks. |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: Transitional evaluation of the state of progress of the projects. |
| S-3 | Ocena podsumowująca: Final evaluation of the seminar consists of the evaluation of two enclosure projects, one review of the state of progress of the projects and the assessment of the two design tasks. |
| S-4 | Ocena podsumowująca: The completion of the lecture is based on the attendance list and the verification test. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WBiA_1-_AS1-I/3_W01 The student knows the objectives and tasks of ergonomics and areas of its application; he knows the basic categories of human motor and sensory disabilities; he knows the principles of anthropometric measurements; he has basic knowledge of biomechanical and physiological conditions of human body fitness. | — | — | C-2, C-1, C-3 | T-W-1 | M-3, M-1, M-2 | S-2, S-1, S-4 |
| WM-WBiA_1-_AS1-I/3_W02 The student knows the methods of ergonomic optimization of computer workstations; he knows the principles of universal design; | — | — | C-2, C-1, C-3 | T-P-1 | M-3, M-2 | S-2, S-1, S-3 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WBiA_1-_??_U01 Student has knowledge about the determinants of the efficiency of the human body, knows the basic categories of human physical disability and ways and methods of adapting objects and spatial elements to meet the needs of users. Student can use the phantoms and anthropometric data and perform analysis of ergonomic workstations. Student does not create solutions discriminatory, prejudicial to the dignity and human rights. Works to improve the quality of the human environment. | — | — | C-2, C-1, C-3 | T-P-1 | M-3, M-2 | S-2, S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WBiA_1-_AS1-I/3_K01 The student avoids discriminatory solutions that undermine the sense of dignity and human rights and works to improve the quality of human life. | — | — | C-3 | T-W-1 | M-3 | S-2, S-1 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WBiA_1-_AS1-I/3_W01 The student knows the objectives and tasks of ergonomics and areas of its application; he knows the basic categories of human motor and sensory disabilities; he knows the principles of anthropometric measurements; he has basic knowledge of biomechanical and physiological conditions of human body fitness. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | The student knows the standards and basic methods of ergonomic and somatic analysis; he knows the rules of optimizing the physical and mental workspace; he knows the rules of selecting ergonomic tools and equipment at the workstation. | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 | ||
| WM-WBiA_1-_AS1-I/3_W02 The student knows the methods of ergonomic optimization of computer workstations; he knows the principles of universal design; | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | A range of knowledge about the categories of people with disabilities and their needs; about certain methods and means of correcting the existing situation and adapting public facilities and spaces for all user groups. | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WBiA_1-_??_U01 Student has knowledge about the determinants of the efficiency of the human body, knows the basic categories of human physical disability and ways and methods of adapting objects and spatial elements to meet the needs of users. Student can use the phantoms and anthropometric data and perform analysis of ergonomic workstations. Student does not create solutions discriminatory, prejudicial to the dignity and human rights. Works to improve the quality of the human environment. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | The student is able to use his knowledge of ergonomics in architectural design; he uses the correct scale of drawings and phantoms; ergonomic analyses of reachability and fields of vision are correct; partial coordination of analyses for different phantoms in horizontal and vertical plane; drawing analyses are presented in a clear and careful way. | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WBiA_1-_AS1-I/3_K01 The student avoids discriminatory solutions that undermine the sense of dignity and human rights and works to improve the quality of human life. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | The student shows little interest in the subject and social issues of architecture; he or she is passive in contacts with the instructor and not very sensitive to the issues of disabled people. | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Literatura podstawowa
- Alexander Ch., A Patern Language - Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press, New York, 1977
- Grandjean, E., Ergonomics of the Home, Wiley, New Jersey, 1973
- Grandjean, E., Ergonomics In Computerized Offices, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London, 2003
- Salvendy G., Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Wiley, New Jersey, 2012
- Tilley A. R., The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design, Wiley, New York, 2002