Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)

Sylabus przedmiotu Seminar III:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Economics
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta licencjat
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Seminar III
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Jednostka WEk
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny prowadzący seminarium Nauczyciel akademicki <wekon@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele
ECTS (planowane) 1,0 ECTS (formy) 1,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
seminariaS6 10 1,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1Selected topic and the supervisor of the diploma thesis

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Introducing the student to the rules of writing diploma theses and the course of the diploma examination

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
seminaria
T-S-1Uniform anti-plagiarism system - analysis of sample reports. The procedure of anti-plagiarism proceedings in force at the Faculty. Overview of the course of the diploma examination. Assessment of the student's own work in the context of a future review. Analysis of examination questions.10
10

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
seminaria
A-S-1Participation in classes10
A-S-2Preparation for the analysis of examination questions and evaluation of the student's own work15
25

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Problem-based learning methods - conversational lecture
M-2Expository methods - informative lecture, explanations and clarifications
M-3Activating methods - a case-study method, didactic discussion

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the student's activity in terms of his / her preparation for the diploma examination

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A10_W01
The student has the knowledge necessary to independently solve research problems. He / she knows the rules of writing a diploma thesis and the course of the diploma examination
Ec_1A_W01, Ec_1A_W09, Ec_1A_W06C-1T-S-1M-1, M-3, M-2S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A10_U01
The student knows how to evaluate the preparation of a solution to the analysed research problem from the point of view of various criteria applicable in the degree awarding process
Ec_1A_U19, Ec_1A_U01, Ec_1A_U02, Ec_1A_U04, Ec_1A_U13C-1T-S-1M-1, M-3, M-2S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_A10_K01
He is ready to critically evaluate his knowledge and received content
Ec_1A_K01, Ec_1A_K07, Ec_1A_K06C-1T-S-1M-2S-1

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A10_W01
The student has the knowledge necessary to independently solve research problems. He / she knows the rules of writing a diploma thesis and the course of the diploma examination
2,0The student does not know the rules of degree awarding and writing a diploma thesis and the course of the diploma examination
3,0The student knows the rules of degree awarding and writing a diploma thesis and the course of the diploma examination to a sufficient degree
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A10_U01
The student knows how to evaluate the preparation of a solution to the analysed research problem from the point of view of various criteria applicable in the degree awarding process
2,0The student does not know how to evaluate the preparation of a solution to the analysed research problem from the point of view of various criteria applicable in the degree awarding process
3,0The student knows how to evaluate the preparation of a solution to the analysed research problem from the point of view of various criteria applicable in the degree awarding process
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_A10_K01
He is ready to critically evaluate his knowledge and received content
2,0
3,0The student is aware of the need to critically evaluate the knowledge and content received on a basic level
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Regulamin studiów. Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie
  2. Procedura procesu dyplomowania na Wydziale Ekonomicznym ZUT w Szczecinie wraz ze standardami pisania prac dyplomowych, dostępna na: https://ekonomia.zut.edu.pl/strona-studentow/studia-kierunki/prace-dyplomowe-licencjackie-i-magisterskie.html
  3. Zenderowski R., Praca magisterska. Licencjat. Przewodnik po metodologii pisania i obrony pracy dyplomowej, CeDeWu, Warszawa, 2020
  4. Zenderowski R., Technika pisania prac magisterskich i licencjackich, CeDeWu, Warszawa, 2020
  5. Stachak S., Podstawy metodologii nauk ekonomicznych, Difin, Warszawa, 2013
  6. Welskop W., Jak napisać pracę licencjacką i magisterską?, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Biznesu i Nauk o Zdrowiu, Łódź, 2014

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Kuzik M., Rzepczyński S., Jak pisać?, PWN, Warszawa, 2008
  2. Grzybowski P.P., Sawicki K., Pisanie prac i sztuka ich prezentacji, Impuls, Kraków, 2010
  3. Wójcik K., Piszę akademicką pracę promocyjną - licencjacką, magisterską, doktorską, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa, 2012
  4. Joy De Jong, Effective strategies for academic writing: essay, paper, thesis, journal article, bachelor, master, phd, Coutinho, 2017
  5. Lancaster Thomas, Avoid Plagiarism, SAGE Publications LTD, 2019

Treści programowe - seminaria

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-S-1Uniform anti-plagiarism system - analysis of sample reports. The procedure of anti-plagiarism proceedings in force at the Faculty. Overview of the course of the diploma examination. Assessment of the student's own work in the context of a future review. Analysis of examination questions.10
10

Formy aktywności - seminaria

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-S-1Participation in classes10
A-S-2Preparation for the analysis of examination questions and evaluation of the student's own work15
25
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_A10_W01The student has the knowledge necessary to independently solve research problems. He / she knows the rules of writing a diploma thesis and the course of the diploma examination
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W01He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the issues in the field of economics and finance, their place in the social sciences system and connections with other scientific disciplines
Ec_1A_W09He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the principles and ethical and moral standards that should be followed in business activity
Ec_1A_W06He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the methods and tools (including IT) of obtaining, processing and presenting data on socio-economic phenomena and processes
Cel przedmiotuC-1Introducing the student to the rules of writing diploma theses and the course of the diploma examination
Treści programoweT-S-1Uniform anti-plagiarism system - analysis of sample reports. The procedure of anti-plagiarism proceedings in force at the Faculty. Overview of the course of the diploma examination. Assessment of the student's own work in the context of a future review. Analysis of examination questions.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Problem-based learning methods - conversational lecture
M-3Activating methods - a case-study method, didactic discussion
M-2Expository methods - informative lecture, explanations and clarifications
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the student's activity in terms of his / her preparation for the diploma examination
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student does not know the rules of degree awarding and writing a diploma thesis and the course of the diploma examination
3,0The student knows the rules of degree awarding and writing a diploma thesis and the course of the diploma examination to a sufficient degree
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_A10_U01The student knows how to evaluate the preparation of a solution to the analysed research problem from the point of view of various criteria applicable in the degree awarding process
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_U19He / she can interpret selected problems of the modern economy in the light of the achievements and views of economics and finance authorities
Ec_1A_U01He / she can use the possessed scientific knowledge to interpret socio-economic phenomena
Ec_1A_U02He / she can apply the possessed theoretical knowledge, properly selecting data, methods and tools, to formulate and solve unusual and complex problems related to socio-economic processes and phenomena, and to solve tasks in conditions that are not fully predictable
Ec_1A_U04He / she can identify market structures and select basic tools and methods of their analysis
Ec_1A_U13He / she is able to prepare typical written works in the field of economics and finance, in Polish or in a foreign language, on specific issues, using theoretical approaches and various sources
Cel przedmiotuC-1Introducing the student to the rules of writing diploma theses and the course of the diploma examination
Treści programoweT-S-1Uniform anti-plagiarism system - analysis of sample reports. The procedure of anti-plagiarism proceedings in force at the Faculty. Overview of the course of the diploma examination. Assessment of the student's own work in the context of a future review. Analysis of examination questions.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Problem-based learning methods - conversational lecture
M-3Activating methods - a case-study method, didactic discussion
M-2Expository methods - informative lecture, explanations and clarifications
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the student's activity in terms of his / her preparation for the diploma examination
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student does not know how to evaluate the preparation of a solution to the analysed research problem from the point of view of various criteria applicable in the degree awarding process
3,0The student knows how to evaluate the preparation of a solution to the analysed research problem from the point of view of various criteria applicable in the degree awarding process
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_A10_K01He is ready to critically evaluate his knowledge and received content
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_K01He / she is ready to define priorities for the implementation of tasks set by himself / herself or others
Ec_1A_K07He / she is ready to show openness to the world and understanding for different cultures
Ec_1A_K06He / she is ready to effectively carry out the assigned tasks while taking into account ethical principles
Cel przedmiotuC-1Introducing the student to the rules of writing diploma theses and the course of the diploma examination
Treści programoweT-S-1Uniform anti-plagiarism system - analysis of sample reports. The procedure of anti-plagiarism proceedings in force at the Faculty. Overview of the course of the diploma examination. Assessment of the student's own work in the context of a future review. Analysis of examination questions.
Metody nauczaniaM-2Expository methods - informative lecture, explanations and clarifications
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the student's activity in terms of his / her preparation for the diploma examination
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0The student is aware of the need to critically evaluate the knowledge and content received on a basic level
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0