Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Architektury - Architecture (S2)

Sylabus przedmiotu Architectural design 2:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Architecture
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom drugiego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta magister
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK, kompetencje inżynierskie PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Architectural design 2
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Projektowania Architektonicznego
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Robert Barełkowski <Robert.Barelkowski@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele Jarosław Bondar <Jaroslaw.Bondar@zut.edu.pl>, Tomasz Sachanowicz <Tomasz.Sachanowicz@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane) 4,0 ECTS (formy) 4,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język angielski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
projektyP2 45 3,00,50zaliczenie
wykładyW2 15 1,00,50egzamin

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1W-1: podstawowa znajomość warunków technicznych, podstawowa wiedza techniczna w zakresie budownictwa ogólnego, podstawowa wiedza o materiałach
W-2W-2: podstawowa wiedza o teorii architektury, znajomość podstaw psychologicznych architektury, wiedza o pierwiastkach antropologicznych w architekturze

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
C-2C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
projekty
T-P-1Introduction to organization of the subject, introduction to design themes, establishing aims and individual programs.3
T-P-2Complexity and area of integration in architectural design – the definition of design problem. Analysis of spatial context (or cultural context), social context, and broad environmental approach.3
T-P-3The definition of compulsory problem solving area for the project. The definition of the idea and functional program.3
T-P-4The establishment of aims and criteria system for self-evaluation of the project. The establishment of spatio-functional program and spatial context with the inclusion of analysis of its multiple interpretations.3
T-P-5The focus of design concept – embodiment of an idea and program within the architectural form. The final definition of project scope.3
T-P-6Project progress screening (also: mid-semester screening) with self-evaluation of the project (current status).3
T-P-7The aim and the structure, the functionality and the durability. The adjustment of the program, formal solution, and response to contexts.3
T-P-8The establishing of action plan for subsequent ranges of the project – parallel design courses, solving dedicated problems of architectural/building technology (variable and adjusted to particular theme of the project), embodiment of architectural idea with the acknowledgment of cultural requirements, with use of technical and technological support.3
T-P-9The elaboration of compulsory systemic non-architectural elements of the project – the structure, installations, etc.3
T-P-10Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals.3
T-P-11Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals (continued). The plan for presentation of final solution / proposal.3
T-P-12Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals (continued). Establishing means for graphic and verbal communication of the project in a clear way.3
T-P-13Consultations – c.d. opracowywania rozwiązań indywidualnych. Detale prezentacji projektu.3
T-P-14Submission of ready-for-final-screening project and elaboration of the presentation.3
T-P-15Final screening of the project – conceptual design, technical design, multimedia presentation.3
45
wykłady
T-W-1Introduction to topics contained within the subject, architecture as a complex system, perspective of complexity in design.1
T-W-2Managing complexity in architectural design – information flow, information validation (hierarchization) and assessing the impact of information on design decisions. Establishing aims of the design.1
T-W-3Design – synergy in acquisition of information and professional knowledge generation. Design and learning.1
T-W-4The area of perception and psychology issues in architecture.1
T-W-5Socio-cultural sphere in architecture.1
T-W-6The meaning of architecture – idea and quality of design solutions (functional, formal).1
T-W-7Object technology – extra-architectural solutions determining the quality of architecture.1
T-W-8Permanent user, temporary user, recipient – meaning, preparation of space and its reception by above mentioned groups.1
T-W-9Typological analysis of objects as point of departure for distinction of differences comprehension and elimination of invalid solutions.1
T-W-10Analytics in design process. Reasoning-focused shaping of decisive background within the field of architecture.1
T-W-11Acknowledging spatial context, interpretation of the notion of context (abstract approach) and its transposition in architecture.1
T-W-12Public discussion – complexity issues, interdisciplinary issues and architecture (students’ participation).1
T-W-13Case studies – discussion of various dedicated types of architectural objects (elaborated in particular semester).1
T-W-14Case studies – discussion of various dedicated types of architectural objects (elaborated in particular semester).1
T-W-15Summary – synthesis of knowledge acquired during semester.1
15

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
projekty
A-P-1Consultations related to the site, criteria of evaluation recognition (disciplinary) – establishing eventual alterations to below given framework4
A-P-2Case studies analyses, typological analyses, understanding of internal object technologies5
A-P-3Elaboration of spatial context, principles of architectural response to relations with surroundings, parametric analysis of design properties8
A-P-4Compilation of functional program, design sketches, variant sketches, working model8
A-P-5Modifications of working model, sketches and feedback8
A-P-6Acceptance for working model and design launching – documentation of concept design and model8
A-P-7Variant design, visual impact analyses, function and program, final acceptance for functional scheme8
A-P-8Final definitione of semiologic impact of object on the surrounding8
A-P-9Final definition of structure, materials configuration, forms8
A-P-10Final definition of technological solution related to technology and spatial distribution of interior disposition5
A-P-11Design – final stage, final drawings, model4
A-P-12Design – final stage, final drawings, model4
A-P-13Design – final stage, final drawings, model and multimedia presentation4
A-P-14Submission of final projects and their elaboration4
A-P-15Screening and giving marks for projects4
90
wykłady
A-W-1attending the lecture15
A-W-2individual work at home – expanding knowledge of subject apprehended on lectures15
30

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
M-2M-2 Exercice-practical methods: observations in situ, design
M-3M-3 Exposing methods: presentation – screening (Project Progress Screening)

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
S-2Ocena formująca: S-2: Summary evaluation: final screening, presentation of the project, substantial complex evaluation of final and submitted project according to criteria indicated in the program of the course

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
AUP_2A_K-10_W01
W1: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of interdisciplinary integration within the field of architecture.
AUP_2A_W01C-1, C-2T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3M-1S-1
AUP_2A_K-10_W02
W2: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of transposition of information/knowledge (interdisciplinary) onto architectural object or architectural space.
AUP_2A_W02C-1, C-2T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3M-1S-1
AUP_2A_K-10_W03
W3: Comprehension of complex systems performance and appropriate interactions of architecture with those systems.
AUP_2A_W03C-1T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3M-1S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
AUP_2A_K-10_U01
U1: Skill to integrate various disciplinary knowledge in the field of architecture and their transposition into architectural design.
AUP_2A_U01C-1, C-2T-P-1, T-P-2M-1, M-2, M-3S-1, S-2
AUP_2A_K-10_U02
U2: Reception of basic skills to manage information within design proces in case of complex task.
AUP_2A_U02C-1, C-2T-P-1, T-P-2, T-P-3, T-P-4M-1, M-2, M-3S-1, S-2
AUP_2A_K-10_U03
U3: Using basic knowledge of complex systems within design.
AUP_2A_U03C-1, C-2T-P-1, T-P-2, T-P-3M-1, M-2, M-3S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
AUP_2A_K-10_K01
KS1: Student has ability to synthesize and communicatively convey design idea in public.
C-1, C-2T-P-14, T-P-15, T-P-6M-1, M-2, M-3S-1, S-2

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
AUP_2A_K-10_W01
W1: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of interdisciplinary integration within the field of architecture.
2,0failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course)
3,0basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
3,5
4,0extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
4,5
5,0outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3
AUP_2A_K-10_W02
W2: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of transposition of information/knowledge (interdisciplinary) onto architectural object or architectural space.
2,0failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course)
3,0basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
3,5
4,0extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
4,5
5,0outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3
AUP_2A_K-10_W03
W3: Comprehension of complex systems performance and appropriate interactions of architecture with those systems.
2,0failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course)
3,0basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
3,5
4,0extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
4,5
5,0outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
AUP_2A_K-10_U01
U1: Skill to integrate various disciplinary knowledge in the field of architecture and their transposition into architectural design.
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
AUP_2A_K-10_U02
U2: Reception of basic skills to manage information within design proces in case of complex task.
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
AUP_2A_K-10_U03
U3: Using basic knowledge of complex systems within design.
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
AUP_2A_K-10_K01
KS1: Student has ability to synthesize and communicatively convey design idea in public.
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Alexander, C., New Concepts in Complexity Theory. Arising from the Studies in the Field of Architecture, Cardiff, 2003, pp. 23
  2. Barełkowski, R., Design Driven by Discovery, in J. Baek, T. Daniell, J. M. Heredia, B. Jacquet and S. Russell, Architecture and Phenomenology, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, EFEO Research Center, Kyoto, 2009
  3. Barełkowski, R., Verbal Thinking in the Design Process. Internal and External Communication of Architectural Creation, Common Ground Publishing, Chicago, 2010, Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, Vol. 4, Issue 5, 127-138
  4. Barełkowski, R., Paradoks skali, Przestrzeń i Forma, Polska Akademia Nauk Oddział w Gdańsku, Szczecin, 2010
  5. Barełkowski, R., Learning design by knowing less, in J. Verbeke i B. Pak (eds.), Knowning (by) Design, Sint-Lucas School of Architecture, Hogeschool voor Wetenschap & Kunst, Brussels, Department of Architecture, KU Leuven, Brussels-Gent-Leuven, 2013, 517-524

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Alexander, C., Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1964
  2. Alexander, C., A Timeless Way of Building, Oxford University Press, New York, 1979
  3. Alexander, C. Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S., A Pattern Language. Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press, New York, 1977

Treści programowe - projekty

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-P-1Introduction to organization of the subject, introduction to design themes, establishing aims and individual programs.3
T-P-2Complexity and area of integration in architectural design – the definition of design problem. Analysis of spatial context (or cultural context), social context, and broad environmental approach.3
T-P-3The definition of compulsory problem solving area for the project. The definition of the idea and functional program.3
T-P-4The establishment of aims and criteria system for self-evaluation of the project. The establishment of spatio-functional program and spatial context with the inclusion of analysis of its multiple interpretations.3
T-P-5The focus of design concept – embodiment of an idea and program within the architectural form. The final definition of project scope.3
T-P-6Project progress screening (also: mid-semester screening) with self-evaluation of the project (current status).3
T-P-7The aim and the structure, the functionality and the durability. The adjustment of the program, formal solution, and response to contexts.3
T-P-8The establishing of action plan for subsequent ranges of the project – parallel design courses, solving dedicated problems of architectural/building technology (variable and adjusted to particular theme of the project), embodiment of architectural idea with the acknowledgment of cultural requirements, with use of technical and technological support.3
T-P-9The elaboration of compulsory systemic non-architectural elements of the project – the structure, installations, etc.3
T-P-10Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals.3
T-P-11Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals (continued). The plan for presentation of final solution / proposal.3
T-P-12Consultations – elaboration of individual solutions / proposals (continued). Establishing means for graphic and verbal communication of the project in a clear way.3
T-P-13Consultations – c.d. opracowywania rozwiązań indywidualnych. Detale prezentacji projektu.3
T-P-14Submission of ready-for-final-screening project and elaboration of the presentation.3
T-P-15Final screening of the project – conceptual design, technical design, multimedia presentation.3
45

Treści programowe - wykłady

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-W-1Introduction to topics contained within the subject, architecture as a complex system, perspective of complexity in design.1
T-W-2Managing complexity in architectural design – information flow, information validation (hierarchization) and assessing the impact of information on design decisions. Establishing aims of the design.1
T-W-3Design – synergy in acquisition of information and professional knowledge generation. Design and learning.1
T-W-4The area of perception and psychology issues in architecture.1
T-W-5Socio-cultural sphere in architecture.1
T-W-6The meaning of architecture – idea and quality of design solutions (functional, formal).1
T-W-7Object technology – extra-architectural solutions determining the quality of architecture.1
T-W-8Permanent user, temporary user, recipient – meaning, preparation of space and its reception by above mentioned groups.1
T-W-9Typological analysis of objects as point of departure for distinction of differences comprehension and elimination of invalid solutions.1
T-W-10Analytics in design process. Reasoning-focused shaping of decisive background within the field of architecture.1
T-W-11Acknowledging spatial context, interpretation of the notion of context (abstract approach) and its transposition in architecture.1
T-W-12Public discussion – complexity issues, interdisciplinary issues and architecture (students’ participation).1
T-W-13Case studies – discussion of various dedicated types of architectural objects (elaborated in particular semester).1
T-W-14Case studies – discussion of various dedicated types of architectural objects (elaborated in particular semester).1
T-W-15Summary – synthesis of knowledge acquired during semester.1
15

Formy aktywności - projekty

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-P-1Consultations related to the site, criteria of evaluation recognition (disciplinary) – establishing eventual alterations to below given framework4
A-P-2Case studies analyses, typological analyses, understanding of internal object technologies5
A-P-3Elaboration of spatial context, principles of architectural response to relations with surroundings, parametric analysis of design properties8
A-P-4Compilation of functional program, design sketches, variant sketches, working model8
A-P-5Modifications of working model, sketches and feedback8
A-P-6Acceptance for working model and design launching – documentation of concept design and model8
A-P-7Variant design, visual impact analyses, function and program, final acceptance for functional scheme8
A-P-8Final definitione of semiologic impact of object on the surrounding8
A-P-9Final definition of structure, materials configuration, forms8
A-P-10Final definition of technological solution related to technology and spatial distribution of interior disposition5
A-P-11Design – final stage, final drawings, model4
A-P-12Design – final stage, final drawings, model4
A-P-13Design – final stage, final drawings, model and multimedia presentation4
A-P-14Submission of final projects and their elaboration4
A-P-15Screening and giving marks for projects4
90
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-W-1attending the lecture15
A-W-2individual work at home – expanding knowledge of subject apprehended on lectures15
30
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięAUP_2A_K-10_W01W1: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of interdisciplinary integration within the field of architecture.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówAUP_2A_W01Knows the principles of construction art, PN and EU norms and standards within the scope necessary for independent performance of design and planning tasks.
Cel przedmiotuC-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
C-2C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury.
Treści programoweT-W-1Introduction to topics contained within the subject, architecture as a complex system, perspective of complexity in design.
T-W-2Managing complexity in architectural design – information flow, information validation (hierarchization) and assessing the impact of information on design decisions. Establishing aims of the design.
T-W-3Design – synergy in acquisition of information and professional knowledge generation. Design and learning.
Metody nauczaniaM-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course)
3,0basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
3,5
4,0extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
4,5
5,0outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięAUP_2A_K-10_W02W2: Acquisition of knowledge on methods of transposition of information/knowledge (interdisciplinary) onto architectural object or architectural space.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówAUP_2A_W02Know building law, selected issues of property law and copyright law within the scope necessary for independent performance of design and planning tasks.
Cel przedmiotuC-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
C-2C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury.
Treści programoweT-W-1Introduction to topics contained within the subject, architecture as a complex system, perspective of complexity in design.
T-W-2Managing complexity in architectural design – information flow, information validation (hierarchization) and assessing the impact of information on design decisions. Establishing aims of the design.
T-W-3Design – synergy in acquisition of information and professional knowledge generation. Design and learning.
Metody nauczaniaM-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course)
3,0basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
3,5
4,0extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
4,5
5,0outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięAUP_2A_K-10_W03W3: Comprehension of complex systems performance and appropriate interactions of architecture with those systems.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówAUP_2A_W03Knows technical and technological conditions of design and planning.
Cel przedmiotuC-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
Treści programoweT-W-1Introduction to topics contained within the subject, architecture as a complex system, perspective of complexity in design.
T-W-2Managing complexity in architectural design – information flow, information validation (hierarchization) and assessing the impact of information on design decisions. Establishing aims of the design.
T-W-3Design – synergy in acquisition of information and professional knowledge generation. Design and learning.
Metody nauczaniaM-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0failing to accomplish educational outcomes as given below (including outcomes as described in detailed program of the course)
3,0basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
3,5
4,0extended accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3
4,5
5,0outstanding accomplishment of educational outcomes and excellent recognition of problems related to these outcomes: W1, W2 and W3
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięAUP_2A_K-10_U01U1: Skill to integrate various disciplinary knowledge in the field of architecture and their transposition into architectural design.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówAUP_2A_U01In his/her work, pursues an individual artistic attitude which is manifested through his/her approach to reality and modern art.
Cel przedmiotuC-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
C-2C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury.
Treści programoweT-P-1Introduction to organization of the subject, introduction to design themes, establishing aims and individual programs.
T-P-2Complexity and area of integration in architectural design – the definition of design problem. Analysis of spatial context (or cultural context), social context, and broad environmental approach.
Metody nauczaniaM-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
M-2M-2 Exercice-practical methods: observations in situ, design
M-3M-3 Exposing methods: presentation – screening (Project Progress Screening)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
S-2Ocena formująca: S-2: Summary evaluation: final screening, presentation of the project, substantial complex evaluation of final and submitted project according to criteria indicated in the program of the course
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięAUP_2A_K-10_U02U2: Reception of basic skills to manage information within design proces in case of complex task.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówAUP_2A_U02Presents individual design and planning concepts and solutions in an attractive manner (graphics, presentations).
Cel przedmiotuC-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
C-2C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury.
Treści programoweT-P-1Introduction to organization of the subject, introduction to design themes, establishing aims and individual programs.
T-P-2Complexity and area of integration in architectural design – the definition of design problem. Analysis of spatial context (or cultural context), social context, and broad environmental approach.
T-P-3The definition of compulsory problem solving area for the project. The definition of the idea and functional program.
T-P-4The establishment of aims and criteria system for self-evaluation of the project. The establishment of spatio-functional program and spatial context with the inclusion of analysis of its multiple interpretations.
Metody nauczaniaM-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
M-2M-2 Exercice-practical methods: observations in situ, design
M-3M-3 Exposing methods: presentation – screening (Project Progress Screening)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
S-2Ocena formująca: S-2: Summary evaluation: final screening, presentation of the project, substantial complex evaluation of final and submitted project according to criteria indicated in the program of the course
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięAUP_2A_K-10_U03U3: Using basic knowledge of complex systems within design.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówAUP_2A_U03Is able to adjust the method to a design or planning task, experiments and uses computer software.
Cel przedmiotuC-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
C-2C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury.
Treści programoweT-P-1Introduction to organization of the subject, introduction to design themes, establishing aims and individual programs.
T-P-2Complexity and area of integration in architectural design – the definition of design problem. Analysis of spatial context (or cultural context), social context, and broad environmental approach.
T-P-3The definition of compulsory problem solving area for the project. The definition of the idea and functional program.
Metody nauczaniaM-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
M-2M-2 Exercice-practical methods: observations in situ, design
M-3M-3 Exposing methods: presentation – screening (Project Progress Screening)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
S-2Ocena formująca: S-2: Summary evaluation: final screening, presentation of the project, substantial complex evaluation of final and submitted project according to criteria indicated in the program of the course
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięAUP_2A_K-10_K01KS1: Student has ability to synthesize and communicatively convey design idea in public.
Cel przedmiotuC-1C-1: Uzyskanie wiedzy i pozyskanie umiejętności radzenia sobie ze złożonymi programami i złożonymi obiektami architektonicznymi – ujęcie funkcjonalne.
C-2C-2: Zdolność uzupełniania obiektu o wartości dodane w procesie nasycania prawidłowego technicznie rozwiązania atrybutami powiązanymi z estetyką i semiologicznym znaczeniem architektury.
Treści programoweT-P-14Submission of ready-for-final-screening project and elaboration of the presentation.
T-P-15Final screening of the project – conceptual design, technical design, multimedia presentation.
T-P-6Project progress screening (also: mid-semester screening) with self-evaluation of the project (current status).
Metody nauczaniaM-1M-1 Handover methods: informative lecture, problem-related lecture, conversatory-based lecture (1 lecture per semester)
M-2M-2 Exercice-practical methods: observations in situ, design
M-3M-3 Exposing methods: presentation – screening (Project Progress Screening)
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: S-1: Formative evaluation: stage-based screenings (after thematic group of classes)
S-2Ocena formująca: S-2: Summary evaluation: final screening, presentation of the project, substantial complex evaluation of final and submitted project according to criteria indicated in the program of the course
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0performance of minimal scope of works / design exercices with accomplishment of educational outcomes U1, U2 and U3 and proving that basic accomplishment of educational outcomes W1, W2 and W3 has been acquired
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0