Administracja Centralna Uczelni - Wymiana międzynarodowa (S2)
Sylabus przedmiotu Master Thesis:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Wymiana międzynarodowa | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | drugiego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | |||
| Obszary studiów | — | ||
| Profil | |||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Master Thesis | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Wymiana Międzynarodowa - WTMIT | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Zbigniew Sekulski <Zbigniew.Sekulski@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 12,0 | ECTS (formy) | 12,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | angielski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Not specified. |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | Within the framework of the Master's Thesis course, students will explore different ways of finding information, defining the scope of a project and doing research, as well as different ways of communicating the results. The Master's thesis course includes the stages of defining a topic and formulating a problem statement, selecting and reviewing relevant literature, designing an empirical study as well as performing it, including data collection and analysis, analysing the empirical data, make theoretical conclusions and finally writing and rewriting a written report called a Master's thesis. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| T-P-1 | Activity specific to the Master Thesis subject. | 20 |
| 20 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| A-P-1 | Master Thesis preparation. | 360 |
| 360 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Project |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena podsumowująca: Students will be expected to complete written tests, projects and homework assignments as specified by the teacher. |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: Student attendance and participation in class sessions play a vital role in successful course completion. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_W01 Knowledge spectific to a Master thesis subject. | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1 | M-1 | S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_U01 Upon completion of this course, the student has achieved the following learning outcomes: (1) the student has access to and insight in (the diversity and boundaries of) the discipline of communication professionals; (2) the student is able to find and select the relevant professional literature by making use of (online) databases; (3) the student is able to evaluate, interpret and compare different academic sources and to use these sources in a project paper; (4) the student is able to write a clear project paper; (5) the student is able to evaluate the findings, strengths and limitations of a certain project line and is able to reflect on this. The learning outcomes of this course will be communicated to the students during the first lectures. | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_K01 Improvement of social and personal competencies including self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, responsible decision-making and others. | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1 | M-1 | S-1 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_W01 Knowledge spectific to a Master thesis subject. | 2,0 | Failing. Students performing at this level demonstrate no evidence of the knowledge embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 2.0 is from 0% to 50% of the total possible score (100%). |
| 3,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a minimal command of the knowledge embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.0 is from 51% to 60% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 3,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a beginning command of the knowledge embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.5 is from 61% to 70% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a developing command of the knowledge embodied by the course at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.0 is from 71% to 80% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a moderate command of the knowledge embodied by the course. Students at this level are approaching the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.5 is from 81% to 90% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 5,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished and strong command of the knowledge embodied by the course. Students at this level are meeting or extending the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 5.0 is from 91% to 100% of the total possible score (100%). |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_U01 Upon completion of this course, the student has achieved the following learning outcomes: (1) the student has access to and insight in (the diversity and boundaries of) the discipline of communication professionals; (2) the student is able to find and select the relevant professional literature by making use of (online) databases; (3) the student is able to evaluate, interpret and compare different academic sources and to use these sources in a project paper; (4) the student is able to write a clear project paper; (5) the student is able to evaluate the findings, strengths and limitations of a certain project line and is able to reflect on this. The learning outcomes of this course will be communicated to the students during the first lectures. | 2,0 | Failing. Students performing at this level demonstrate no evidence of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 2.0 is from 0% to 50% of the total possible score (100%). |
| 3,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a minimal command of the knowledge and/or skills embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.0 is from 51% to 60% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 3,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a beginning command of the knowledge and/or skills embodied by the course assessed at their grade level. The range for the grade of 3.5 is from 61% to 70% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a developing command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.0 is from 71% to 80% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 4,5 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a moderate command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course. Students at this level are approaching the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 4.5 is from 81% to 90% of the total possible score (100%). | |
| 5,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished and strong command of the knowledge, skills, and practices embodied by the course. Students at this level are meeting or extending the standards at their grade level. The range for the grade of 5.0 is from 91% to 100% of the total possible score (100%). |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WTMiT_2-_null_K01 Improvement of social and personal competencies including self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, responsible decision-making and others. | 2,0 | Students performing at this level demonstrate no evidence of increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. |
| 3,0 | Acceptable student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 3,5 | Below average student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 4,0 | Average student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 4,5 | Above average student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. | |
| 5,0 | Oustending student's achivements in increased social and emotional skills, improved attitude toward self and others, improved positive social behaviors, decreased conduct problems and emotional distress. |
Literatura podstawowa
- Russel L. Ackoff, Scientific method: Optimizing Applied Research Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962
Literatura dodatkowa
- Jan BABICZ, Encyclopedia of ship knowledge, Baobab Naval Consultancy, Gdańsk, 2007