Administracja Centralna Uczelni - Wymiana międzynarodowa (S1)
Sylabus przedmiotu Human-Computer Interaction:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Wymiana międzynarodowa | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | pierwszego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | |||
| Obszary studiów | — | ||
| Profil | |||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Human-Computer Interaction | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Systemów Multimedialnych | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Adam Nowosielski <Adam.Nowosielski@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 3,0 | ECTS (formy) | 3,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | angielski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Elementary programming skills |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | The main objective of the course is to familiarize students with the current trends in human-computer interaction. New approaches like touchless interaction as well as classical methods are discussed and analyzed during the course. |
| C-2 | Students are familiarized with the wide range of modern equipment, software and algorithms of human-computer interaction. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| laboratoria | ||
| T-L-1 | Introduction to human-computer interaction. Improving everyday computing: mouse gestures, virtual assistants, etc. Detection and recognition of the user. Who is the user? – assessment of sex, age and emotional state. Touchless interaction: gestures recognition, hand operated interfaces, head operated interfaces, touchless text entry. Eyetracking - determining the areas of interest on the screen. Assistive technologies for user with disabilities. | 15 |
| 15 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | Introduction to human-computer interaction. Improving everyday computing: mouse gestures, virtual assistants, etc. Detection and recognition of the user. Who is the user? – assessment of sex, age and emotional state. Touchless interaction: gestures recognition, hand operated interfaces, head operated interfaces, touchless text entry. Eyetracking - determining the areas of interest on the screen. Assistive technologies for user with disabilities. | 15 |
| 15 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| laboratoria | ||
| A-L-1 | Participation in classes. | 15 |
| A-L-2 | Preparation for the classes. | 7 |
| A-L-3 | Participation in the consultations for laboratories. | 4 |
| A-L-4 | Preparation of reports for selected laboratories. | 8 |
| A-L-5 | Design and implementation of own human-computer interaction system. | 19 |
| A-L-6 | Preparation of the final report. | 7 |
| 60 | ||
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | Presence at lectures. | 15 |
| A-W-2 | Literature reading. | 15 |
| 30 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Lectures: informative, problem solving, conversational |
| M-2 | Laboratory classes with a computer |
| M-3 | Problems discution at laboratory classes |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena podsumowująca: Final grade based on continuous assessment of tasks carried out during the classes. |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: Verification of reports from selected laboratories. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WI_1-_??_W01 Students are familarized with the current trends in human-computer interaction. They gain knowledge about new approaches like touchless interaction as well as classical methods. | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WI_1-_??_U01 Students are familiarized with the wide range of modern equipment, software and algorithms of human-computer interaction. | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-L-1 | M-2 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM-WI_1-_??_K01 Student has the consciousness of building communication systems in the strict connection with a social group that is the addressee of the given solutions (culture, norms, status). Student is aware of the responsibility for the wrong interpretation of the communication message. | — | — | C-1, C-2 | T-W-1, T-L-1 | M-3 | S-1 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WI_1-_??_W01 Students are familarized with the current trends in human-computer interaction. They gain knowledge about new approaches like touchless interaction as well as classical methods. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | Student submits at least 50% of reports | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WI_1-_??_U01 Students are familiarized with the wide range of modern equipment, software and algorithms of human-computer interaction. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | Student submits at least 50% of reports | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| WM-WI_1-_??_K01 Student has the consciousness of building communication systems in the strict connection with a social group that is the addressee of the given solutions (culture, norms, status). Student is aware of the responsibility for the wrong interpretation of the communication message. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | Student is active at problem solving classes | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Literatura podstawowa
- A. Dix, J. Finlay, G. D. Abowd, R. Beale, Human-Computer Interaction, Pearson, 2004, 3rd Edition
- B. Shneiderman, C. Plaisant, Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Pearson Addison-Wesley, 2009, 5th Edition
- D. K. Kumar, S. P. Arjunan, Human-Computer Interface Technologies for the Motor Impaired, CRC Press, 2015
- Daniel Wigdor, Dennis Wixon, Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture, Morgan Kaufmann, 2011, 1st Edition