Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Technologii i Inżynierii Chemicznej - Inżynieria chemiczna (N3)

Sylabus przedmiotu Philosophy:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Inżynieria chemiczna
Forma studiów studia niestacjonarne Poziom trzeciego stopnia
Stopnień naukowy absolwenta doktor
Obszary studiów studia trzeciego stopnia
Profil
Moduł
Przedmiot Philosophy
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Studium Nauk Humanistycznych i Pedagogicznych
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Dariusz Zienkiewicz <Dariusz.Zienkiewicz@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele Aleksander Butrynowski <Aleksander.Butrynowski@zut.edu.pl>, Dariusz Zienkiewicz <Dariusz.Zienkiewicz@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane) 2,0 ECTS (formy) 2,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język angielski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
wykładyW4 15 2,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1The basic of philosophy
W-2Basic knowledge of physics and other life sciences

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Knowledge of basic rules of inference applicable in contemporary natural sciences. The ability to use this knowledge for rational thinking in terms of his professional competence.
C-2Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
wykłady
T-W-1Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.2
T-W-2Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).2
T-W-3Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.2
T-W-4Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).2
T-W-5Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.2
T-W-6Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.2
T-W-7Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?2
T-W-8Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).1
15

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
wykłady
A-W-1Attendance in classes15
A-W-2Consultation2
A-W-3Substantive preparation for credit43
60

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Informative lecture
M-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Oral presentation of lectures and the task of literature

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_W01
He has knowledge of the role of the natural sciences and their place in the sciences Culture. He has knowledge of the specifics of scientific thinking.
ChE_3-_W09C-1, C-2T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6, T-W-8, T-W-7M-1, M-2, M-3S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_U01
He can discuss using logically and substantively justified arguments, aware of the specifics of scientific thinking.
ChE_3-_U02C-2T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6, T-W-8, T-W-7M-2, M-3S-1

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_K01
He has competencies related to teamwork by making Material selection and then discussing issues in the team. He takes responsibility for the quality of discussion, he fulfills his task resulting from the division of duties within the group; He can evaluate the task.
ChE_3-_K01C-2T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6, T-W-8, T-W-7M-2, M-3S-1

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_W01
He has knowledge of the role of the natural sciences and their place in the sciences Culture. He has knowledge of the specifics of scientific thinking.
2,0
3,0Superficially presents the role of natural sciences in culture; Is not aware of the specificity of the requirements of thinking
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_U01
He can discuss using logically and substantively justified arguments, aware of the specifics of scientific thinking.
2,0
3,0In discussions, he does not use scientific terminology and makes logical mistakes; Moderate activity team activity.
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt kształceniaOcenaKryterium oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_K01
He has competencies related to teamwork by making Material selection and then discussing issues in the team. He takes responsibility for the quality of discussion, he fulfills his task resulting from the division of duties within the group; He can evaluate the task.
2,0
3,0Manifests basic competences related to teamwork; It selects the material, sporadically participates in the discussion. At basic level he can present his competences during the exam.
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Chalmers A., Czym jest to, co zwiemy nauką?, Siedmioróg, 1997
  2. Heller M., Filozofia nauki. Wprowadzenie, Petrus, 2011
  3. Penrose R., Droga do rzeczywistości. Wyczerpujący przewodnik po prawach rządzących Wszechświatem, Prószyński i S-ka, 2010

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Greene B., Piękno wszechświata. Superstruny, ukryte wymiary i poszukiwania teorii ostatecznej, Prószyński i S-ka, 2005
  2. Marciszewski W., Sztuczna inteligencja, Znak, 1998

Treści programowe - wykłady

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-W-1Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.2
T-W-2Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).2
T-W-3Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.2
T-W-4Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).2
T-W-5Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.2
T-W-6Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.2
T-W-7Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?2
T-W-8Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).1
15

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-W-1Attendance in classes15
A-W-2Consultation2
A-W-3Substantive preparation for credit43
60
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_A05b_W01He has knowledge of the role of the natural sciences and their place in the sciences Culture. He has knowledge of the specifics of scientific thinking.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_W09She/he has extended knowledge of the non-technological aspects of engineering and research, such as economics, management, intellectual property, communication (also in a foreign language).
Cel przedmiotuC-1Knowledge of basic rules of inference applicable in contemporary natural sciences. The ability to use this knowledge for rational thinking in terms of his professional competence.
C-2Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.
Treści programoweT-W-1Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.
T-W-2Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).
T-W-3Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.
T-W-4Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).
T-W-5Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.
T-W-6Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.
T-W-8Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).
T-W-7Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?
Metody nauczaniaM-1Informative lecture
M-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Oral presentation of lectures and the task of literature
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0Superficially presents the role of natural sciences in culture; Is not aware of the specificity of the requirements of thinking
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_A05b_U01He can discuss using logically and substantively justified arguments, aware of the specifics of scientific thinking.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_U02She/he can interpret and critically analyze information obtained from literature and draw the correct conclusions, formulate reasoned opinions in English.
Cel przedmiotuC-2Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.
Treści programoweT-W-1Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.
T-W-2Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).
T-W-3Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.
T-W-4Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).
T-W-5Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.
T-W-6Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.
T-W-8Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).
T-W-7Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?
Metody nauczaniaM-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0In discussions, he does not use scientific terminology and makes logical mistakes; Moderate activity team activity.
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształceniaChE_3-_A05b_K01He has competencies related to teamwork by making Material selection and then discussing issues in the team. He takes responsibility for the quality of discussion, he fulfills his task resulting from the division of duties within the group; He can evaluate the task.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscyplinyChE_3-_K01She/he is able to think and act in an innovative, creative and enterprising way.
Cel przedmiotuC-2Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.
Treści programoweT-W-1Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.
T-W-2Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).
T-W-3Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.
T-W-4Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).
T-W-5Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.
T-W-6Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.
T-W-8Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).
T-W-7Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?
Metody nauczaniaM-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0
3,0Manifests basic competences related to teamwork; It selects the material, sporadically participates in the discussion. At basic level he can present his competences during the exam.
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0