Wydział Inżynierii Mechanicznej i Mechatroniki - Materials Engineering (S2)
Sylabus przedmiotu Intellectual Property Protection II:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Materials Engineering | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | drugiego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | magister inżynier | ||
| Obszary studiów | nauki techniczne | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Intellectual Property Protection II | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Dział Wynalazczości i Ochrony Patentowej | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Monika Wielecka <Monika.Wielecka@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 1,0 | ECTS (formy) | 1,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | polski |
| Blok obieralny | — | Grupa obieralna | — |
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | certificated knowledge of bases of intellectal property- copyrights and industrial property. Certification may be positive grade given after at least 10 hours cours "Intellecual property proection" or "Copyrights protection" |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | presentation to students different kinds of patent examination, classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno) and databases for invention, utility models, designs, trade marks (PPO databeses, espacenet, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases); showing to student what kind of information can be found in databases and how can they use such information. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| wykłady | ||
| T-W-1 | repetition of knowledge about bases of intellectual property | 4 |
| T-W-2 | presentation of databases: PPO databases, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases, espacenet | 8 |
| T-W-3 | presentation of classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno) | 3 |
| 15 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| wykłady | ||
| A-W-1 | participation in classes | 15 |
| A-W-2 | searching in databases | 8 |
| A-W-3 | searching in classifications | 4 |
| A-W-4 | making a written elaborate based on search made in databases | 3 |
| 30 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | lecture joint with student's practical work with databases |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena podsumowująca: grade for written elaborate based on search made in databases |
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IM_2A_A02_W01 student chooses right databases for subject of search; students identifies subject of intellectual propery rights in products and services; student knows bases of intellectual propery protection | ME_2A_W06 | — | C-1 | T-W-2 | M-1 | S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IM_2A_A02_U01 student can finde information in databases; student understands information indicate in databases; student can use information obtain from databases in planing further proceedings | ME_2A_U01 | — | C-1 | T-W-2, T-W-3 | M-1 | S-1 |
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IM_2A_A02_K01 student knows that during making decision should follows rules indicate in law; student makes task in specified time student knows that his/her behaviour can cause the infrigement of intellectual propery rights | ME_2A_K01 | — | C-1 | T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3 | M-1 | S-1 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt kształcenia | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| IM_2A_A02_W01 student chooses right databases for subject of search; students identifies subject of intellectual propery rights in products and services; student knows bases of intellectual propery protection | 2,0 | student is unable to make searching in database independent; student doesn't know where and what should search; student doesn't choose right database in accordance to search subject; student can't make independent conclusion or make mistake conclusion |
| 3,0 | student can partly choose: right databases, right criterions to search in databases. Student is inactive. | |
| 3,5 | student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0 | |
| 4,0 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes) | |
| 4,5 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes) | |
| 5,0 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt kształcenia | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| IM_2A_A02_U01 student can finde information in databases; student understands information indicate in databases; student can use information obtain from databases in planing further proceedings | 2,0 | student is unable to independent work, doesn't understad what should do, can't choose right databases, can't make his/her own conclusion or conclusion aren't right |
| 3,0 | student partly chooses right databases to search, partly chooses rigt criterias to search, is unactive during wark, | |
| 3,5 | student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0 | |
| 4,0 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes) | |
| 4,5 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes) | |
| 5,0 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt kształcenia | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| IM_2A_A02_K01 student knows that during making decision should follows rules indicate in law; student makes task in specified time student knows that his/her behaviour can cause the infrigement of intellectual propery rights | 2,0 | student is unable to make searching in database independent; student doesn't know where and what should search; student doesn't choose right database in accordance to search subject; student can't make independent conclusion or makes mistake conclusion |
| 3,0 | student can partly choose: right databases, right criterions to search in databases. Student is inactive | |
| 3,5 | student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0 | |
| 4,0 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes) | |
| 4,5 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes) | |
| 5,0 | student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion |