ZUT - Krajowe Ramy Kwalifikacji / Rok 2017/2018 / Wydział Technologii i Inżynierii Chemicznej / Inżynieria chemiczna (N3) / Sylabus przedmiotu

Wydział Technologii i Inżynierii Chemicznej - Inżynieria chemiczna (N3)

Sylabus przedmiotu Philosophy:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów	Inżynieria chemiczna
Forma studiów	studia niestacjonarne	Poziom	trzeciego stopnia
Stopnień naukowy absolwenta	doktor inżynier
Obszary studiów	studia trzeciego stopnia
Profil
Moduł	—
Przedmiot	Philosophy
Specjalność	przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca	Studium Nauk Humanistycznych i Pedagogicznych
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny	Dariusz Zienkiewicz <Dariusz.Zienkiewicz@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele	Aleksander Butrynowski <Aleksander.Butrynowski@zut.edu.pl>, Dariusz Zienkiewicz <Dariusz.Zienkiewicz@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane)	2,0	ECTS (formy)	2,0
Forma zaliczenia	zaliczenie	Język	angielski
Blok obieralny	—	Grupa obieralna	—

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktyczna	KOD	Semestr	Godziny	ECTS	Waga	Zaliczenie
wykłady	W	4	15	2,0	1,00	zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KOD	Wymaganie wstępne
W-1	The basic of philosophy
W-2	Basic knowledge of physics and other life sciences

Cele przedmiotu

KOD	Cel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1	Knowledge of basic rules of inference applicable in contemporary natural sciences. The ability to use this knowledge for rational thinking in terms of his professional competence.
C-2	Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KOD	Treść programowa	Godziny
wykłady
T-W-1	Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.	2
T-W-2	Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).	2
T-W-3	Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.	2
T-W-4	Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).	2
T-W-5	Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.	2
T-W-6	Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.	2
T-W-7	Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?	2
T-W-8	Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).	1
		15

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KOD	Forma aktywności	Godziny
wykłady
A-W-1	Attendance in classes	15
A-W-2	Consultation	2
A-W-3	Substantive preparation for credit	43
		60

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KOD	Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1	Informative lecture
M-2	Problem lecture
M-3	Conversational lecture

Sposoby oceny

KOD	Sposób oceny
S-1	Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Oral presentation of lectures and the task of literature

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_W01 He has knowledge of the role of the natural sciences and their place in the sciences Culture. He has knowledge of the specifics of scientific thinking.	ChE_3-_W09	—	C-1, C-2	T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6, T-W-7, T-W-8	M-1, M-2, M-3	S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_U01 He can discuss using logically and substantively justified arguments, aware of the specifics of scientific thinking.	ChE_3-_U02	—	C-2	T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6, T-W-7, T-W-8	M-2, M-3	S-1

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty kształcenia	Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny	Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia	Cel przedmiotu	Treści programowe	Metody nauczania	Sposób oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_K01 He has competencies related to teamwork by making Material selection and then discussing issues in the team. He takes responsibility for the quality of discussion, he fulfills his task resulting from the division of duties within the group; He can evaluate the task.	ChE_3-_K01	—	C-2	T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3, T-W-4, T-W-5, T-W-6, T-W-7, T-W-8	M-2, M-3	S-1

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt kształcenia	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_W01 He has knowledge of the role of the natural sciences and their place in the sciences Culture. He has knowledge of the specifics of scientific thinking.	2,0
	3,0	Superficially presents the role of natural sciences in culture; Is not aware of the specificity of the requirements of thinking
	3,5
	4,0
	4,5
	5,0

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt kształcenia	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_U01 He can discuss using logically and substantively justified arguments, aware of the specifics of scientific thinking.	2,0
	3,0	In discussions, he does not use scientific terminology and makes logical mistakes; Moderate activity team activity.
	3,5
	4,0
	4,5
	5,0

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt kształcenia	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
ChE_3-_A05b_K01 He has competencies related to teamwork by making Material selection and then discussing issues in the team. He takes responsibility for the quality of discussion, he fulfills his task resulting from the division of duties within the group; He can evaluate the task.	2,0
	3,0	Manifests basic competences related to teamwork; It selects the material, sporadically participates in the discussion. At basic level he can present his competences during the exam.
	3,5
	4,0
	4,5
	5,0

Literatura podstawowa

Chalmers A., What Is This Thing Called Science?, University of Queensland Press, 2013
Penrose R, The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, Vintage; Reprint edition, 2007

Literatura dodatkowa

Greene B, The Elegant Universe, W. W. Norton & Company, 2010

Treści programowe - wykłady

KOD	Treść programowa	Godziny
T-W-1	Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.	2
T-W-2	Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).	2
T-W-3	Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.	2
T-W-4	Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).	2
T-W-5	Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.	2
T-W-6	Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.	2
T-W-7	Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?	2
T-W-8	Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).	1
		15

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KOD	Forma aktywności	Godziny
A-W-1	Attendance in classes	15
A-W-2	Consultation	2
A-W-3	Substantive preparation for credit	43
		60

(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia	ChE_3-_A05b_W01	He has knowledge of the role of the natural sciences and their place in the sciences Culture. He has knowledge of the specifics of scientific thinking.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny	ChE_3-_W09	She/he has extended knowledge of the non-technological aspects of engineering and research, such as economics, management, intellectual property, communication (also in a foreign language).
Cel przedmiotu	C-1	Knowledge of basic rules of inference applicable in contemporary natural sciences. The ability to use this knowledge for rational thinking in terms of his professional competence.
Cel przedmiotu	C-2	Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.
Treści programowe	T-W-1	Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.
	T-W-2	Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).
	T-W-3	Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.
	T-W-4	Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).
	T-W-5	Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.
	T-W-6	Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.
	T-W-7	Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?
	T-W-8	Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).
Metody nauczania	M-1	Informative lecture
	M-2	Problem lecture
	M-3	Conversational lecture
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
Sposób oceny	S-2	Ocena podsumowująca: Oral presentation of lectures and the task of literature
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0
	3,0	Superficially presents the role of natural sciences in culture; Is not aware of the specificity of the requirements of thinking
	3,5
	4,0
	4,5
	5,0

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia	ChE_3-_A05b_U01	He can discuss using logically and substantively justified arguments, aware of the specifics of scientific thinking.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny	ChE_3-_U02	She/he can interpret and critically analyze information obtained from literature and draw the correct conclusions, formulate reasoned opinions in English.
Cel przedmiotu	C-2	Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.
Treści programowe	T-W-1	Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.
	T-W-2	Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).
	T-W-3	Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.
	T-W-4	Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).
	T-W-5	Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.
	T-W-6	Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.
	T-W-7	Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?
	T-W-8	Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).
Metody nauczania	M-2	Problem lecture
Metody nauczania	M-3	Conversational lecture
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0
	3,0	In discussions, he does not use scientific terminology and makes logical mistakes; Moderate activity team activity.
	3,5
	4,0
	4,5
	5,0

Pole	KOD	Znaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty kształcenia	ChE_3-_A05b_K01	He has competencies related to teamwork by making Material selection and then discussing issues in the team. He takes responsibility for the quality of discussion, he fulfills his task resulting from the division of duties within the group; He can evaluate the task.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla dyscypliny	ChE_3-_K01	She/he is able to think and act in an innovative, creative and enterprising way.
Cel przedmiotu	C-2	Analytical skill of benchmarking, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions, making choices based on accepted criteria.
Treści programowe	T-W-1	Early Greek philosophers: Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus and Democritus. The Sophists and Socrates.
	T-W-2	Plato and Aristotle -theory of knowledge; knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa); theory of Ideas; classification of the sciences, the theoretical, the practical and the productive (theoria, praxis, techne).
	T-W-3	Medieval Philosophy: St. Augustine – St. Thomas Aquinas – Faith and reason.
	T-W-4	Modern Philosophy and the Scientific Revolution. (Copernicus and Galileo).
	T-W-5	Cartesian Dualism and Materialism.
	T-W-6	Logical Positivism : The verifiability theory of meaning.
	T-W-7	Popper on scientific methodology and knowledge; verification or falsification?
	T-W-8	Postmodernism (Foucault, Rorty, Feyerabend).
Metody nauczania	M-2	Problem lecture
Metody nauczania	M-3	Conversational lecture
Sposób oceny	S-1	Ocena formująca: Course activity during the lecture.
Kryteria oceny	Ocena	Kryterium oceny
	2,0
	3,0	Manifests basic competences related to teamwork; It selects the material, sporadically participates in the discussion. At basic level he can present his competences during the exam.
	3,5
	4,0
	4,5
	5,0