Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)
specjalność: Property Valuation and Real Estate Transactions

Sylabus przedmiotu Economic and environmental consulting:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Economics
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta licencjat
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Economic and environmental consulting
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Nieruchomości
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Aneta Zaremba <Aneta.Zaremba@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele Teodor Skotarczak <Teodor.Skotarczak@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane) 2,0 ECTS (formy) 2,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
wykładyW6 10 1,00,50zaliczenie
konwersatoriaK6 15 1,00,50zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1Selected aspects of knowledge in the field of microeconomics and management.

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
konwersatoria
T-K-1Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise3
T-K-2Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect3
T-K-3Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics3
T-K-4Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action3
T-K-5Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems2
T-K-6Final tests1
15
wykłady
T-W-1Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.2
T-W-2Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union3
T-W-3Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.2
T-W-4Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.2
T-W-5Final tests1
10

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
konwersatoria
A-K-1Participation in classes15
A-K-2Preparation for classes, including problem solving5
A-K-3Preparation for final tests5
25
wykłady
A-W-1Participation in lectures10
A-W-2Preparation for lectures - studying the literature of the subject8
A-W-3Preparation for final tests7
25

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Information lecture
M-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture
M-4Exercises

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
S-2Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
S-3Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
S-4Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_C19_W01
The student knows and understands the economic aspect of environmental consulting
Ec_1A_W01, Ec_1A_W04, Ec_1A_W07C-1T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-4, T-W-3M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4S-1, S-3, S-2, S-4

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_C19_U01
student has the ability to use the acquired economic knowledge to analyze economic issues related to the activities of agricultural enterprises.
Ec_1A_U01, Ec_1A_U02, Ec_1A_U03C-1T-K-5, T-K-3, T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-4M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4S-1, S-3, S-2, S-4

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
Ec_1A_C19_K01
The student is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way as part of the implementation and execution of environmental consulting procedures.
Ec_1A_K01, Ec_1A_K02, Ec_1A_K03C-1T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-4, T-W-3, T-K-5, T-K-3, T-K-1, T-K-2, T-K-4M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4S-1, S-3, S-2, S-4

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C19_W01
The student knows and understands the economic aspect of environmental consulting
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way. In the field of teamwork, the student: can not plan and execute work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or, despite this help, does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
3,0The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. Generally, it has the correct effect.
4,0The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
4,5The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
5,0The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. It demonstrates the timeliness and flawless presentation of results.

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C19_U01
student has the ability to use the acquired economic knowledge to analyze economic issues related to the activities of agricultural enterprises.
2,0He can not identify and cope alone with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
Ec_1A_C19_K01
The student is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way as part of the implementation and execution of environmental consulting procedures.
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
3,0The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
4,0The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
4,5The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
5,0The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.

Literatura podstawowa

  1. B.A. Babcock, R.W. Fraser, J.N. Lekakis, Risk Management and the Environment: Agriculture in Perspective Paperback – Import, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010
  2. Laura Vivian, Environment and Agriculture: Perspectives on Sustainability, Syrawood Publishing House, 2016
  3. Wortmann D., Von der Vision zur strategie: Grundelmente Und Entwicklungsmuster einer politik der Nachhaltichkeit, [w:] Sustainable Development – Utopie oder realistische Vision?, Hamburg, 2002

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1996

Treści programowe - konwersatoria

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-K-1Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise3
T-K-2Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect3
T-K-3Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics3
T-K-4Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action3
T-K-5Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems2
T-K-6Final tests1
15

Treści programowe - wykłady

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-W-1Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.2
T-W-2Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union3
T-W-3Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.2
T-W-4Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.2
T-W-5Final tests1
10

Formy aktywności - konwersatoria

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-K-1Participation in classes15
A-K-2Preparation for classes, including problem solving5
A-K-3Preparation for final tests5
25
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-W-1Participation in lectures10
A-W-2Preparation for lectures - studying the literature of the subject8
A-W-3Preparation for final tests7
25
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C19_W01The student knows and understands the economic aspect of environmental consulting
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_W01He / she knows and understands at an advanced level economic and social facts and phenomena as well as theories explaining the complex relationships between them constituting the basic general knowledge in the discipline of economics and finance, as well as selected issues in the field of detailed knowledge
Ec_1A_W04He / she knows and understands at an advanced level the forms of social institutions (public, cultural, political, legal, economic), their structures, as well as the relationships between them on a national and international scale
Ec_1A_W07He / she knows and understands the fundamental economic and social dilemmas of modern civilisation, including the economy
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.
Treści programoweT-W-1Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.
T-W-2Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union
T-W-4Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.
T-W-3Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.
Metody nauczaniaM-1Information lecture
M-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture
M-4Exercises
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
S-3Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
S-2Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
S-4Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way. In the field of teamwork, the student: can not plan and execute work correctly and on time, does not report the need for assistance in consultations or, despite this help, does not achieve the minimum standards of performance.
3,0The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks. Generally, it has the correct effect.
4,0The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can specify the goals of his own work and distribute or help in the distribution of tasks among team members, he can use contextual information to carry out team tasks.
4,5The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and actively participate in the distribution of tasks and their implementation at each stage of work.
5,0The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future. In the field of teamwork, the student: can independently plan, specify goals and distribute tasks by skills and control the situation of the project through proper motivation to act. It demonstrates the timeliness and flawless presentation of results.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C19_U01student has the ability to use the acquired economic knowledge to analyze economic issues related to the activities of agricultural enterprises.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_U01He / she can use knowledge to identify and interpret socio-economic processes and phenomena with the use of methods and tools appropriate for economics
Ec_1A_U02He / she can apply knowledge to formulate and solve complex and unusual problems concerning socio-economic processes and phenomena in the micro-, meso- and macro-scale
Ec_1A_U03He / she is able to solve tasks and problems in conditions that are not fully predictable, properly selecting sources and information from them, making their evaluation, making a critical analysis of them and synthesising them
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.
Treści programoweT-K-5Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems
T-K-3Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics
T-K-1Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise
T-K-2Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect
T-K-4Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action
Metody nauczaniaM-1Information lecture
M-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture
M-4Exercises
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
S-3Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
S-2Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
S-4Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0He can not identify and cope alone with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0Student is able to identify and deal with a sufficient grade (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties associated with the use of acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0The student, on the good mark can identify and independently deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, on the assessment of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0Student, on the very good assessment, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process of applying knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięEc_1A_C19_K01The student is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way as part of the implementation and execution of environmental consulting procedures.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówEc_1A_K01He / she is ready to critically assess the possessed knowledge, skills and received content, to recognise the importance of knowledge in solving cognitive and practical problems, and is aware of the need to consult experts in case of difficulties with solving the problem on his / her own
Ec_1A_K02He / she is ready to fulfil social obligations, co-organise projects for the social environment, as well as initiate activities for the public interest
Ec_1A_K03He / she is ready to think and act in an entrepreneurial way
Cel przedmiotuC-1Preparing students to self-write a plan of a consulting nature for farms, especially in the economic aspect.
Treści programoweT-W-1Basics of environmental consulting in the economic aspect.
T-W-2Implementation of agri-environmental programs in the European Union
T-W-4Procedures for solving problems regarding environmental requirements in rural areas.
T-W-3Environmental consulting in the activity of agricultural enterprises. Case Study.
T-K-5Problems of the agricultural population as a subject of environmental consulting, proper identification of environmental and economic problems
T-K-3Selected problems with the agricultural advisor profession. The adviser's profile and preparation of the candidate for the agricultural adviser profession, personality traits, the principles of the adviser's effective operation, professional adviser's ethics
T-K-1Consulting as a social and professional activity on the example of an agricultural enterprise
T-K-2Entrepreneurship and innovation in rural areas - environmental aspect
T-K-4Interpersonal communication in environmental consulting. Model of the interpersonal communication process, communication as a social action
Metody nauczaniaM-1Information lecture
M-2Problem lecture
M-3Conversational lecture
M-4Exercises
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena formująca: Assessment of student's achievements by asking questions in writing and orally during the course
S-3Ocena podsumowująca: Final test in writing, covering issues and discussed in the course of seminars
S-2Ocena formująca: Analysis and assessment of students' activity during classes
S-4Ocena podsumowująca: Credits in writing including questions about lectures
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
3,0The student, on the satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualifying. In the field of team work, the student: plans and performs work in a clumsy way at each of its stages (preparatory, idea and project, executive, pre-presentation control and presentation itself).
3,5The student, on the assessment of a sufficient plus shows skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
4,0The student, on the good mark, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the subject matter and the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
4,5The student, on the good grade plus, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
5,0The student, on the very good note, presents opinions and views that demonstrate the meaning of subject matter and the possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.