Wydział Architektury - Architecture (S2)
Sylabus przedmiotu Parametric design 2:
Informacje podstawowe
| Kierunek studiów | Architecture | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forma studiów | studia stacjonarne | Poziom | drugiego stopnia |
| Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta | magister | ||
| Obszary studiów | charakterystyki PRK, dziedzina sztuki PRK, kompetencje inżynierskie PRK | ||
| Profil | ogólnoakademicki | ||
| Moduł | — | ||
| Przedmiot | Parametric design 2 | ||
| Specjalność | przedmiot wspólny | ||
| Jednostka prowadząca | Katedra Mieszkalnictwa i Podstaw Techniczno-Ekologicznych Architektury | ||
| Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny | Krystyna Januszkiewicz <Krystyna.Januszkiewicz@zut.edu.pl> | ||
| Inni nauczyciele | |||
| ECTS (planowane) | 4,0 | ECTS (formy) | 4,0 |
| Forma zaliczenia | zaliczenie | Język | angielski |
| Blok obieralny | 4 | Grupa obieralna | 5 |
Formy dydaktyczne
Wymagania wstępne
| KOD | Wymaganie wstępne |
|---|---|
| W-1 | Using parameters to define geometry marks a fundamental shift in aesthetic value: from the exact ‘repetition’ of elements in traditional design to a varied but ‘similar’ use of elements in parametric design. Based on the variables, options will be explored (as many as mathematically possible), by automating the process of exploration, similar in principle to the rapid doodles developed during initial conceptual stage. This course uses Rhino & Grasshopper as an aid in design exploration by looking at Facade Design as a complex inter-relationship of intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. Project covers of parametric design oriented to sustainable projects. The Course covers whole process from form finding to fabrication preparation and 3d print of developed models. |
Cele przedmiotu
| KOD | Cel modułu/przedmiotu |
|---|---|
| C-1 | The aim is that students learn architectural design and using digital tools based on NURBS in the design process. This is the start to the digital design thinking, the way in which the digital designer is beginning to think, employing digital tools and interacting with representational media. The subject also aims to develop the learner’s interest, knowledge and skill of contemporary architectural design, including the relationship of contemporary architectural projects and spaces to urbanism and urban settings. Emphasis is placed upon learning advanced design concepts, skills and knowledge related to the making of architectural design proposals. Participants in the subject are beginners in using advanced design tools such as: Rhino and Grasshopper, 3D max or Maya. They were used to making design projects traditionally and preparing the project representation using popular design tools such as: AutoCAD, ArchiCad, Sketchpad and Photoshop or Corel Draw. Therefore students have to learn to understand not only the logic of the advanced software, but also the logic of using these tools in the design process. There is a unique opportunity in Poland for the students to develop their skills to introduce the computer into architectural practice. |
Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć
| KOD | Treść programowa | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| T-P-1 | The design task: The task was to design a public use architectural object in a municipality with an attractive landscape, located close to a large urban area, e.g. the city of Szczecin. It would be a place of leisure for the residents of the city, especially on the days free from work. At the same time, it would meet the needs of the local community. The utility function of the object included a swimming pool with the stands, a Waterpark, catering services with a restaurant and a cafeteria, and other services to ensure the yearround attractiveness and profitability of the object. The design process is focused on usage of digital tools, particularly Rhinoceros with Grasshopper. Course will cover whole process from form finding to fabrication preparation and 3d print of developed models. | 45 |
| 45 | ||
Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności
| KOD | Forma aktywności | Godziny |
|---|---|---|
| projekty | ||
| A-P-1 | Design process also focused on usage of digital tools, particularly Rhinoceros with Grasshopper. Course will cover whole process from form finding to fabrication preparation and 3d print of developed models. | 53 |
| A-P-2 | Participation in classes | 45 |
| A-P-3 | consultation | 2 |
| 100 | ||
Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne
| KOD | Metoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne |
|---|---|
| M-1 | Workshop (design studio) |
Sposoby oceny
| KOD | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|
| S-1 | Ocena podsumowująca: Assessment will be made on different stages of project. Final presentation on A0 boards and Power Point presentation. Presentation will include all the aspects of thesis defence including questions and project discussions with other students. Elements of evaluation based on thesis requirements. |
| S-2 | Ocena formująca: Assessment will be made on 3 in-term presentations prepared on different stages of project. |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_EB4-5_W05 Understand and apply the principles underlying the theory of computation and parametric design in architecture. Understand different aspects of computation, and their integration in design pipeline. | AUP_2A_W02, AUP_2A_W03, AUP_2A_W17, AUP_2A_W18, AUP_2A_W19 | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_EB4-5_U03 Be able to applying and test the use of parametric design tools and their inter-relationships to generate simple and complex architectural objects. | AUP_2A_U03, AUP_2A_U04, AUP_2A_U05, AUP_2A_U08, AUP_2A_U09, AUP_2A_U10, AUP_2A_U12, AUP_2A_U17 | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Zamierzone efekty uczenia się | Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiów | Odniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształcenia | Odniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżyniera | Cel przedmiotu | Treści programowe | Metody nauczania | Sposób oceny |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_EB4-5_K06 The student can highlight the significance an innovative new approach to mass-customization in architecture social processes that is compatible with Parametricism as well as in architectural design and in other fields. | AUP_2A_K02, AUP_2A_K05, AUP_2A_K07 | — | — | C-1 | T-P-1 | M-1 | S-1, S-2 |
Kryterium oceny - wiedza
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_EB4-5_W05 Understand and apply the principles underlying the theory of computation and parametric design in architecture. Understand different aspects of computation, and their integration in design pipeline. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | The student has the ability to use parametric modeling tools. | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - umiejętności
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_EB4-5_U03 Be able to applying and test the use of parametric design tools and their inter-relationships to generate simple and complex architectural objects. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | The student is poor in skill of use parametric digital tools related to design architecture objects of complex geometry. | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne
| Efekt uczenia się | Ocena | Kryterium oceny |
|---|---|---|
| AUP_2A_EB4-5_K06 The student can highlight the significance an innovative new approach to mass-customization in architecture social processes that is compatible with Parametricism as well as in architectural design and in other fields. | 2,0 | |
| 3,0 | The student is poor in ability a think critically about the appropriate uses and applications of parametric design and critique the use of computation in architecture. | |
| 3,5 | ||
| 4,0 | ||
| 4,5 | ||
| 5,0 |
Literatura podstawowa
- John Frazer, Parametric Computation: History and Future, John Wiley & Sons, London, 2016, pp. 18-23, AD - Parametricism 2.0: Rethinking Architecture's Agenda for the 21st Century
- Mauro Ch., Geometry and Architecture: NURBS, Design and Construction, Journal of Mathematics & Design, 2004, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 135-139
- Robert Woodbury, Elements of Parametric Design, Routledge, Abingdon, 2010
- Bollinger K., Grohman M., Tessmann O., Form, Force, Performance. Multi-parametric Structural Design, AD, 2008, Vol. 78, No. 2–3, pp. 20–25.
- Kolarevic B., Architecture in Digital Age. Design and Manufacturing, Taylor & Francis, New York and London, 2005
- Karen M. Kensek, Douglas E. Noble, Building Information Modeling: BIM in Current and Future Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2014
- Januszkiewicz K., Kowalski K., Parametric Architecture in the Urban Space, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Prague, 2017, 245, pp. 1-10.
- K. Kowalski, K. Januszkiewicz, A parametric green architecture in urban space, a new approach to design environmental-friendlybuildings, International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM, Vienna, 2017, pp. 735-742.
- Baliński G., Januszkiewicz K., Digial Tectonic Design as a new Approach to Architectural Design Methodology, Procedia Engineering, 2016, 161, pp. 1504-1508.
- Januszkiewicz K., Banachowicz M., Nonlinear Shaping Architectur. Designed with using Evolutionary Structural Optimization Tools, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Prague, 2017
- Bollinger K., Grohman M., Tessmann O., Form, Force, Performance. Multi-parametric Structural Design, Architectural Design, London, 2008, Vol. 78, No. 2-3, pp. 20-25
- Burry M., Between Surface and Substance, Architectural Design, London, 2003, Vol. 73, No 2, pp. 8-19.
- Burns K., Surface: Architecture’s Expanded Field, Architectural Design, London, 2003, Vol. 73, No 2, pp. 86–92.
- 2018, These readings (refers 1-4,6,7,) available at the leader personal website Krystyna Januszkiewicz academia.edu or Karol Gracjan Kowalski academia.edu
Literatura dodatkowa
- Robert Woodbury, Robert Aish, Axel Kilian, Some Patterns for Parametric Modeling, ACADIA, Halifax, 2007, In Expanding Bodies: Art "Cities" Environment: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), pp. 222-229.
- Collins M.W., Brebbia C.A., Design and Nature II: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, WIT Press, 2004
- Di Cristina G., The Topological Tendency in Architecture, Wiley-Academy, Chichester, 2001, pp. 6-13
- Chaszar A., Blurring the Lines. Exploration of Current CAD/CAM Techniques, Architectural Design, London, 2003, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 111–117.
- Hensel M., Menges A., Inclusive Performance; Efficiency Versus Effectiveness. Toward Morpho-Ecological Approach for Design, Architectural Design, London, 2008, Vol. 78, No. 2–3., pp. 54–63.
- Hensel M., Towards Self-Organisational and Multiple-Performance Capacity in Architecture, Architectural Design, London, 2006, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 5–11.
- Hensel M., Fit Fabric: Versatility Through Redundancy and Differentiation, Architectural Design, London, 2004, Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 40-47.