Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Inżynierii Mechanicznej i Mechatroniki - Materials Engineering (S2)

Sylabus przedmiotu Intellectual Property Protection II:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Materials Engineering
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom drugiego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta magister inżynier
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK, kompetencje inżynierskie PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Intellectual Property Protection II
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Dział Wynalazczości i Ochrony Patentowej
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Monika Wielecka <Monika.Wielecka@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele
ECTS (planowane) 1,0 ECTS (formy) 1,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny Grupa obieralna

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
wykładyW1 15 1,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1certificated knowledge of bases of intellectal property- copyrights and industrial property. Certification may be positive grade given after at least 10 hours cours "Intellecual property proection" or "Copyrights protection"

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1presentation to students different kinds of patent examination, classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno) and databases for invention, utility models, designs, trade marks (PPO databeses, espacenet, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases); showing to student what kind of information can be found in databases and how can they use such information.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
wykłady
T-W-1repetition of knowledge about bases of intellectual property4
T-W-2presentation of databases: PPO databases, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases, espacenet8
T-W-3presentation of classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno)3
15

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
wykłady
A-W-1participation in classes15
A-W-2searching in databases8
A-W-3searching in classifications4
A-W-4making a written elaborate based on search made in databases3
30

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1lecture joint with student's practical work with databases

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena podsumowująca: grade for written elaborate based on search made in databases

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
IM_2A_A02_W01
student chooses right databases for subject of search; students identifies subject of intellectual propery rights in products and services; student knows bases of intellectual propery protection
ME_2A_W06C-1T-W-2M-1S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
IM_2A_A02_U01
student can finde information in databases; student understands information indicate in databases; student can use information obtain from databases in planing further proceedings
ME_2A_U01C-1T-W-2, T-W-3M-1S-1

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaOdniesienie do efektów uczenia się prowadzących do uzyskania tytułu zawodowego inżynieraCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
IM_2A_A02_K01
student knows that during making decision should follows rules indicate in law; student makes task in specified time student knows that his/her behaviour can cause the infrigement of intellectual propery rights
ME_2A_K01C-1T-W-1, T-W-2, T-W-3M-1S-1

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
IM_2A_A02_W01
student chooses right databases for subject of search; students identifies subject of intellectual propery rights in products and services; student knows bases of intellectual propery protection
2,0student is unable to make searching in database independent; student doesn't know where and what should search; student doesn't choose right database in accordance to search subject; student can't make independent conclusion or make mistake conclusion
3,0student can partly choose: right databases, right criterions to search in databases. Student is inactive.
3,5student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0
4,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes)
4,5student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes)
5,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
IM_2A_A02_U01
student can finde information in databases; student understands information indicate in databases; student can use information obtain from databases in planing further proceedings
2,0student is unable to independent work, doesn't understad what should do, can't choose right databases, can't make his/her own conclusion or conclusion aren't right
3,0student partly chooses right databases to search, partly chooses rigt criterias to search, is unactive during wark,
3,5student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0
4,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes)
4,5student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes)
5,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
IM_2A_A02_K01
student knows that during making decision should follows rules indicate in law; student makes task in specified time student knows that his/her behaviour can cause the infrigement of intellectual propery rights
2,0student is unable to make searching in database independent; student doesn't know where and what should search; student doesn't choose right database in accordance to search subject; student can't make independent conclusion or makes mistake conclusion
3,0student can partly choose: right databases, right criterions to search in databases. Student is inactive
3,5student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0
4,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes)
4,5student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes)
5,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion

Treści programowe - wykłady

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-W-1repetition of knowledge about bases of intellectual property4
T-W-2presentation of databases: PPO databases, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases, espacenet8
T-W-3presentation of classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno)3
15

Formy aktywności - wykłady

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-W-1participation in classes15
A-W-2searching in databases8
A-W-3searching in classifications4
A-W-4making a written elaborate based on search made in databases3
30
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięIM_2A_A02_W01student chooses right databases for subject of search; students identifies subject of intellectual propery rights in products and services; student knows bases of intellectual propery protection
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówME_2A_W06Has knowledge necessary for understanding social, economic, legal and other extra-technological aspects of engineering activities and their application in practice
Cel przedmiotuC-1presentation to students different kinds of patent examination, classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno) and databases for invention, utility models, designs, trade marks (PPO databeses, espacenet, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases); showing to student what kind of information can be found in databases and how can they use such information.
Treści programoweT-W-2presentation of databases: PPO databases, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases, espacenet
Metody nauczaniaM-1lecture joint with student's practical work with databases
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: grade for written elaborate based on search made in databases
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0student is unable to make searching in database independent; student doesn't know where and what should search; student doesn't choose right database in accordance to search subject; student can't make independent conclusion or make mistake conclusion
3,0student can partly choose: right databases, right criterions to search in databases. Student is inactive.
3,5student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0
4,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes)
4,5student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes)
5,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięIM_2A_A02_U01student can finde information in databases; student understands information indicate in databases; student can use information obtain from databases in planing further proceedings
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówME_2A_U01Can acquire information from literature, databases and other sources; also in a foreign language; can integrate obtained information, interpret them, draw conclusions and formulate and justify opinions
Cel przedmiotuC-1presentation to students different kinds of patent examination, classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno) and databases for invention, utility models, designs, trade marks (PPO databeses, espacenet, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases); showing to student what kind of information can be found in databases and how can they use such information.
Treści programoweT-W-2presentation of databases: PPO databases, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases, espacenet
T-W-3presentation of classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno)
Metody nauczaniaM-1lecture joint with student's practical work with databases
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: grade for written elaborate based on search made in databases
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0student is unable to independent work, doesn't understad what should do, can't choose right databases, can't make his/her own conclusion or conclusion aren't right
3,0student partly chooses right databases to search, partly chooses rigt criterias to search, is unactive during wark,
3,5student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0
4,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes)
4,5student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes)
5,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięIM_2A_A02_K01student knows that during making decision should follows rules indicate in law; student makes task in specified time student knows that his/her behaviour can cause the infrigement of intellectual propery rights
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówME_2A_K01Can think and act in creative and entrepreneurial manner
Cel przedmiotuC-1presentation to students different kinds of patent examination, classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno) and databases for invention, utility models, designs, trade marks (PPO databeses, espacenet, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases); showing to student what kind of information can be found in databases and how can they use such information.
Treści programoweT-W-1repetition of knowledge about bases of intellectual property
T-W-2presentation of databases: PPO databases, romarin, hague express, EUIPO bases, espacenet
T-W-3presentation of classifications (international patent, nice, viena, locarno)
Metody nauczaniaM-1lecture joint with student's practical work with databases
Sposób ocenyS-1Ocena podsumowująca: grade for written elaborate based on search made in databases
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0student is unable to make searching in database independent; student doesn't know where and what should search; student doesn't choose right database in accordance to search subject; student can't make independent conclusion or makes mistake conclusion
3,0student can partly choose: right databases, right criterions to search in databases. Student is inactive
3,5student proceeds between note 3,0 and 4,0
4,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has some mistakes)
4,5student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion (student's work has only few mistakes)
5,0student chooses right databases, right criterion to search in databases, is active, creative and independent during work, can prepare right conclusion