Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie

Wydział Ekonomiczny - Economics (S1)

Sylabus przedmiotu Economic projects using EU funds:

Informacje podstawowe

Kierunek studiów Economics
Forma studiów studia stacjonarne Poziom pierwszego stopnia
Tytuł zawodowy absolwenta licencjat
Obszary studiów charakterystyki PRK
Profil ogólnoakademicki
Moduł
Przedmiot Economic projects using EU funds
Specjalność przedmiot wspólny
Jednostka prowadząca Katedra Studiów Regionalnych i Europejskich
Nauczyciel odpowiedzialny Bartosz Mickiewicz <Bartosz.Mickiewicz@zut.edu.pl>
Inni nauczyciele Milena Bera <Milena.Bera@zut.edu.pl>
ECTS (planowane) 2,0 ECTS (formy) 2,0
Forma zaliczenia zaliczenie Język polski
Blok obieralny 2 Grupa obieralna 2

Formy dydaktyczne

Forma dydaktycznaKODSemestrGodzinyECTSWagaZaliczenie
projektyP4 30 2,01,00zaliczenie

Wymagania wstępne

KODWymaganie wstępne
W-1Basics of knowledge in subjects: macroeconomics, microeconomics.

Cele przedmiotu

KODCel modułu/przedmiotu
C-1The student knows the practical methods and tools necessary for the planning and management of projects co-financed from public funds, mainly from the European Union funds.
C-2Developing skills in the use of such project planning tools as the project life cycle, identification of problems and needs, "problem tree" and "goal tree", logical matrix (LFA), Gantt chart as a set of methods recommended by the European Commission.
C-3Preparing and conducting presentations on the basic issues of EU policy, European funds and operational programs.
C-4Shaping skills in building a partnership for the implementation of projects.

Treści programowe z podziałem na formy zajęć

KODTreść programowaGodziny
projekty
T-P-1The logic of intervention of EU funds.5
T-P-2EU policy and tools for their implementation.5
T-P-3Legal basis for granting support from EU funds and operational programs.4
T-P-4Project - definitions. Features of a good design. Project cycle. Methodology of project cycle management. Active project planning method - analysis and planning phase.5
T-P-5Phase of analysis: analysis of subjects, analysis of problems (problem tree), analysis of goals (goal tree), analysis of options and choice of strategy.4
T-P-6Planning phase: logical matrix (definition, limitations related to the logic table), risk analysis, project indicators (product, result, impact) project schedule (Gantt chart), resource utilization plan and budget.4
T-P-7Methods for the evaluation of economic projects: economic and financial (static and dynamic) methods for assessing investment projects.1
T-P-8Project implementation (monitoring and reporting). Evaluation and control of the project. Building a partnership for the implementation of projects.2
30

Obciążenie pracą studenta - formy aktywności

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
projekty
A-P-1Participation in projects.30
A-P-2Reading the indicated literature in the field of preparing economic projects and the European funds.10
A-P-3Preparing for the colloquium.5
A-P-4Preparation of a project on the use of EU funds.15
60

Metody nauczania / narzędzia dydaktyczne

KODMetoda nauczania / narzędzie dydaktyczne
M-1Presenting methods
M-2Lecture
M-3Programmed-exposing methods (demonstration).

Sposoby oceny

KODSposób oceny
S-1Ocena formująca: Evaluation of student's progress in acquiring knowledge by asking oral questions at the beginning of the lecture.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the economic project prepared in groups using EU funds.
S-3Ocena podsumowująca: Rating from the colloquium checking knowledge gained during lectures.

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - wiedza

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
E_1A_O13_W01
The student has a basic knowledge of institutions involved in the project financing processes from EU funds at the EU and national level. Knowledge in the field of planning including, in particular, the planning of economic projects and the economic and financial analysis necessary for the economic justification of the project.
E_1A_W03, E_1A_W12C-2, C-1, C-4, C-3T-P-7, T-P-6, T-P-5, T-P-8, T-P-4M-3, M-2, M-1S-3, S-1, S-2

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - umiejętności

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
E_1A_O13_U01
The development of the project requires the cooperation of the student team and the practical application of the acquired knowledge.
E_1A_U03C-2, C-4, C-3T-P-6, T-P-5, T-P-8, T-P-4M-3S-2

Zamierzone efekty uczenia się - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięOdniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówOdniesienie do efektów zdefiniowanych dla obszaru kształceniaCel przedmiotuTreści programoweMetody nauczaniaSposób oceny
E_1A_O13_K01
The implementation of projects using EU funds requires an absolute knowledge of the principles of sustainable development, and only with their consideration it is possible to obtain such funds.
E_1A_K06C-2, C-1, C-4, C-3T-P-7, T-P-6, T-P-5, T-P-8, T-P-2, T-P-4, T-P-3M-3, M-2, M-1S-2

Kryterium oceny - wiedza

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
E_1A_O13_W01
The student has a basic knowledge of institutions involved in the project financing processes from EU funds at the EU and national level. Knowledge in the field of planning including, in particular, the planning of economic projects and the economic and financial analysis necessary for the economic justification of the project.
2,0The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - formulate a short (even incomplete) but correct statement for the majority of the subject areas discussed in the classes. The student receives an unsatisfactory grade if he / she does not show interest in the program content or evades the activity and his / her absence does not guarantee that the material is catching up.
3,0Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
3,5A student at a satisfactory plus grade: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
4,0Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
4,5Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material,- in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning- shows interest in relation to knowledge,- speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
5,0Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.

Kryterium oceny - umiejętności

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
E_1A_O13_U01
The development of the project requires the cooperation of the student team and the practical application of the acquired knowledge.
2,0The student can not identify and deal with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0The student, for a satisfactory grade, can identify and deal with (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the use of acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, for the grade of a sufficient plus, can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0Student, on the good grade, can identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, for the grade of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0The student, for the very good grade, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process with the application of knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.

Kryterium oceny - inne kompetencje społeczne i personalne

Efekt uczenia sięOcenaKryterium oceny
E_1A_O13_K01
The implementation of projects using EU funds requires an absolute knowledge of the principles of sustainable development, and only with their consideration it is possible to obtain such funds.
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
3,0The student, on a satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualified.
3,5The student, for the grade of a sufficient plus, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
4,0The student, for the good grade, presents opinions and views proving the understanding of the subject matter and obtaining the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
4,5The student, for the grade of a good plus, presents opinions and views proving the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
5,0The student, on the very good grade, presents opinions and views that show the meaning of subject matter and possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.

Literatura podstawowa

  1. Benjamin C. Esty, Modern Project Finance: A Casebook, John Wiley & Sons, 2008, ISBN-13: 978-0471434252
  2. M. A. Mian, Project Economics and Decision Analysis: Probabilistic Models, PennWell Corp.; 2 edition, 2015, ISBN-13: 978-1593702090

Literatura dodatkowa

  1. Colective work, The Evaluation of Enterprise. A Critical View, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2018, ISBN13 (EAN): 9781138601314

Treści programowe - projekty

KODTreść programowaGodziny
T-P-1The logic of intervention of EU funds.5
T-P-2EU policy and tools for their implementation.5
T-P-3Legal basis for granting support from EU funds and operational programs.4
T-P-4Project - definitions. Features of a good design. Project cycle. Methodology of project cycle management. Active project planning method - analysis and planning phase.5
T-P-5Phase of analysis: analysis of subjects, analysis of problems (problem tree), analysis of goals (goal tree), analysis of options and choice of strategy.4
T-P-6Planning phase: logical matrix (definition, limitations related to the logic table), risk analysis, project indicators (product, result, impact) project schedule (Gantt chart), resource utilization plan and budget.4
T-P-7Methods for the evaluation of economic projects: economic and financial (static and dynamic) methods for assessing investment projects.1
T-P-8Project implementation (monitoring and reporting). Evaluation and control of the project. Building a partnership for the implementation of projects.2
30

Formy aktywności - projekty

KODForma aktywnościGodziny
A-P-1Participation in projects.30
A-P-2Reading the indicated literature in the field of preparing economic projects and the European funds.10
A-P-3Preparing for the colloquium.5
A-P-4Preparation of a project on the use of EU funds.15
60
(*) 1 punkt ECTS, odpowiada około 30 godzinom aktywności studenta
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O13_W01The student has a basic knowledge of institutions involved in the project financing processes from EU funds at the EU and national level. Knowledge in the field of planning including, in particular, the planning of economic projects and the economic and financial analysis necessary for the economic justification of the project.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_W03Ma podstawową wiedzę na temat relacji między strukturami i instytucjami społecznymi w skali krajowej i międzynarodowej
E_1A_W12Ma podstawową wiedzę o metodach analizy ekonomiczno-finansowej oraz planowania
Cel przedmiotuC-2Developing skills in the use of such project planning tools as the project life cycle, identification of problems and needs, "problem tree" and "goal tree", logical matrix (LFA), Gantt chart as a set of methods recommended by the European Commission.
C-1The student knows the practical methods and tools necessary for the planning and management of projects co-financed from public funds, mainly from the European Union funds.
C-4Shaping skills in building a partnership for the implementation of projects.
C-3Preparing and conducting presentations on the basic issues of EU policy, European funds and operational programs.
Treści programoweT-P-7Methods for the evaluation of economic projects: economic and financial (static and dynamic) methods for assessing investment projects.
T-P-6Planning phase: logical matrix (definition, limitations related to the logic table), risk analysis, project indicators (product, result, impact) project schedule (Gantt chart), resource utilization plan and budget.
T-P-5Phase of analysis: analysis of subjects, analysis of problems (problem tree), analysis of goals (goal tree), analysis of options and choice of strategy.
T-P-8Project implementation (monitoring and reporting). Evaluation and control of the project. Building a partnership for the implementation of projects.
T-P-4Project - definitions. Features of a good design. Project cycle. Methodology of project cycle management. Active project planning method - analysis and planning phase.
Metody nauczaniaM-3Programmed-exposing methods (demonstration).
M-2Lecture
M-1Presenting methods
Sposób ocenyS-3Ocena podsumowująca: Rating from the colloquium checking knowledge gained during lectures.
S-1Ocena formująca: Evaluation of student's progress in acquiring knowledge by asking oral questions at the beginning of the lecture.
S-2Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the economic project prepared in groups using EU funds.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student is not able to: - define basic concepts of the subject, - indicate what is the subject literature and what is the goal, subject and the most important issues within the program, - formulate a short (even incomplete) but correct statement for the majority of the subject areas discussed in the classes. The student receives an unsatisfactory grade if he / she does not show interest in the program content or evades the activity and his / her absence does not guarantee that the material is catching up.
3,0Student, for a satisfactory grade: - in the field of knowledge, he mastered and absorbed the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in the range of attitudes towards knowledge, the average interested (partially indifferent), - in the field of expressing knowledge, she commits many minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements is largely incorrect).
3,5A student at a satisfactory plus grade: - in the area of knowledge he mastered the basic programming material, - in the field of understanding of knowledge he mastered the basic scope of material, - in terms of the ratio to the knowledge transferred, the average interest remains, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he makes minor mistakes in the content and language (the quality of the statements partly incorrect).
4,0Student, for a good grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered almost all programming material and knowledge acquired the basic content of the program almost exactly, - in terms of understanding knowledge, he almost completely mastered the entire scope of the material, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge, it shows interest, - in the field of expressing knowledge, he commits slight deficiencies (statements have slight errors).
4,5Student, for good plus grade: - in the area of knowledge, he mastered the program material,- in terms of understanding knowledge, he mastered all program content, properly explains their meaning- shows interest in relation to knowledge,- speaks without difficulty using the substantive vocabulary.
5,0Student, for very good grade: - in terms of knowledge, it goes beyond the curriculum material, - demonstrates the understanding of knowledge without reservations to the course of reasoning, - in terms of attitudes towards knowledge shows a lot of interest and cognitive curiosity, can propose a context in which knowledge finds or can find practical application, - speaks a faultless language, properly substantive.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O13_U01The development of the project requires the cooperation of the student team and the practical application of the acquired knowledge.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_U03Umie organizować pracę własną i zespołu
Cel przedmiotuC-2Developing skills in the use of such project planning tools as the project life cycle, identification of problems and needs, "problem tree" and "goal tree", logical matrix (LFA), Gantt chart as a set of methods recommended by the European Commission.
C-4Shaping skills in building a partnership for the implementation of projects.
C-3Preparing and conducting presentations on the basic issues of EU policy, European funds and operational programs.
Treści programoweT-P-6Planning phase: logical matrix (definition, limitations related to the logic table), risk analysis, project indicators (product, result, impact) project schedule (Gantt chart), resource utilization plan and budget.
T-P-5Phase of analysis: analysis of subjects, analysis of problems (problem tree), analysis of goals (goal tree), analysis of options and choice of strategy.
T-P-8Project implementation (monitoring and reporting). Evaluation and control of the project. Building a partnership for the implementation of projects.
T-P-4Project - definitions. Features of a good design. Project cycle. Methodology of project cycle management. Active project planning method - analysis and planning phase.
Metody nauczaniaM-3Programmed-exposing methods (demonstration).
Sposób ocenyS-2Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the economic project prepared in groups using EU funds.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student can not identify and deal with the difficulties that may arise in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He can not apply practically acquired knowledge, he has basic problems with interpretation and inference.
3,0The student, for a satisfactory grade, can identify and deal with (with the help of a teacher or with the support of third parties) with selected difficulties related to the use of acquired knowledge. He has very limited ability to put knowledge into practice and makes mistakes in non-primary tasks.
3,5The student, for the grade of a sufficient plus, can identify and deal with, provided that additional support is obtained, with difficulties related to the application of the acquired knowledge. Has limited ability to apply knowledge in practice and makes mistakes in tasks in more difficult tasks.
4,0Student, on the good grade, can identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. Without errors, he applies the acquired knowledge to solve simple and medium-difficult tasks, makes mistakes in interpretation and inferring in more difficult contexts.
4,5The student, for the grade of a good plus can independently identify and deal with basic difficulties in the situation of applying the acquired knowledge. He skilfully interprets and concludes in most contexts and tasks before him, understands the sense of mistakes and has the ability to improve.
5,0The student, for the very good grade, independently identifies and solves the difficulties associated with the process with the application of knowledge in practice. Flawlessly interprets and concludes, regardless of the level of difficulty of the issues in the subject matter. Expands your skills by combining the knowledge and skills you have previously acquired and searching for optimal solutions.
PoleKODZnaczenie kodu
Zamierzone efekty uczenia sięE_1A_O13_K01The implementation of projects using EU funds requires an absolute knowledge of the principles of sustainable development, and only with their consideration it is possible to obtain such funds.
Odniesienie do efektów kształcenia dla kierunku studiówE_1A_K06Uwzględniania aspektów rozwoju zrównoważonego w podejmowanych działaniach
Cel przedmiotuC-2Developing skills in the use of such project planning tools as the project life cycle, identification of problems and needs, "problem tree" and "goal tree", logical matrix (LFA), Gantt chart as a set of methods recommended by the European Commission.
C-1The student knows the practical methods and tools necessary for the planning and management of projects co-financed from public funds, mainly from the European Union funds.
C-4Shaping skills in building a partnership for the implementation of projects.
C-3Preparing and conducting presentations on the basic issues of EU policy, European funds and operational programs.
Treści programoweT-P-7Methods for the evaluation of economic projects: economic and financial (static and dynamic) methods for assessing investment projects.
T-P-6Planning phase: logical matrix (definition, limitations related to the logic table), risk analysis, project indicators (product, result, impact) project schedule (Gantt chart), resource utilization plan and budget.
T-P-5Phase of analysis: analysis of subjects, analysis of problems (problem tree), analysis of goals (goal tree), analysis of options and choice of strategy.
T-P-8Project implementation (monitoring and reporting). Evaluation and control of the project. Building a partnership for the implementation of projects.
T-P-2EU policy and tools for their implementation.
T-P-4Project - definitions. Features of a good design. Project cycle. Methodology of project cycle management. Active project planning method - analysis and planning phase.
T-P-3Legal basis for granting support from EU funds and operational programs.
Metody nauczaniaM-3Programmed-exposing methods (demonstration).
M-2Lecture
M-1Presenting methods
Sposób ocenyS-2Ocena podsumowująca: Evaluation of the economic project prepared in groups using EU funds.
Kryteria ocenyOcenaKryterium oceny
2,0The student has no basic knowledge of the subject, which prevents him from showing competence. He presents wrong views and opinions, even in the situation of hints, he can not present competences in correct inference and interpretation skills. It reveals the lack of commitment and the lack of willingness to do the job in a proper way.
3,0The student, on a satisfactory grade, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, with numerous errors not fully qualified.
3,5The student, for the grade of a sufficient plus, demonstrates skills, commitment and performance of duties at the basic level, is able to plan the performance of the work and reveals the ability to complete the basic scope of the plan. He makes mistakes, but he usually carries out key areas correctly.
4,0The student, for the good grade, presents opinions and views proving the understanding of the subject matter and obtaining the basic skills for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
4,5The student, for the grade of a good plus, presents opinions and views proving the meaning of the key subject of the subject and the possibilities and abilities for the future practical use of the acquired knowledge and skills.
5,0The student, on the very good grade, presents opinions and views that show the meaning of subject matter and possibilities and the ability to use the acquired knowledge and skills in the future.